Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision		 Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
communication_of_science [2007-10-12 12:29] – theunkarelsecommunication_of_science [2007-10-12 12:42] – theunkarelse
Line 194: Line 194:
 Working with: Working with:
   * diabetics.   * diabetics.
 +  * people with burns.
   * congenital heart defects.   * congenital heart defects.
   * mentally disabled.   * mentally disabled.
Line 235: Line 236:
     * treating other types of knowledge such as a patients daily experience as equal to scientific knowledge can be felt as a threat to their authority by scientists.     * treating other types of knowledge such as a patients daily experience as equal to scientific knowledge can be felt as a threat to their authority by scientists.
     * patients are not 'naive' anymore but are well informed proto-professionals, which gives them a certain mindset similar to the scientists. The real 'naive' patients that you want, are hard to find.     * patients are not 'naive' anymore but are well informed proto-professionals, which gives them a certain mindset similar to the scientists. The real 'naive' patients that you want, are hard to find.
 +
 +== How do the anticipated results pan-out? ==
 +
 +| ^ anticipated problems              ^ results                                        ^ 
 +^ |small impact on policy and science | a large impact due to involving patient groups |
 +^ |little public interest             | a much closer network with the general public  |
 +^ |results are not representative     | more implementation of research                |
 +^ |expensive                          | same                                           |
 +^ |science-illiteracy problem         | needs good moderation                          |
  
  
  • communication_of_science.txt
  • Last modified: 2007-10-12 12:42
  • by theunkarelse