Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
companions_in_games [2009-01-26 12:44] – davegriffithscompanions_in_games [2009-01-26 12:45] – davegriffiths
Line 42: Line 42:
   * The use of natural language is one of the quickest ways to annoy the user, and break any illusion of intelligence, so it's generally left out, or a language which you can't quite understand is used instead, but which still conveys basic levels of emotion.   * The use of natural language is one of the quickest ways to annoy the user, and break any illusion of intelligence, so it's generally left out, or a language which you can't quite understand is used instead, but which still conveys basic levels of emotion.
   * User investment in the design or construction of the agent increases a feeling of ownership, and therefore attachment - "My robot is the only one like it".   * User investment in the design or construction of the agent increases a feeling of ownership, and therefore attachment - "My robot is the only one like it".
-  * Collective intelligence is generally more robust, and more fun than relying on a single agent.+  * Collective intelligence is generally more robust, and likely to resolve in useful emergent behaviour than relying on a single agent.
  • companions_in_games.txt
  • Last modified: 2009-01-29 13:16
  • by davegriffiths