Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
dust_and_shadow:aesthetic_naturalism [2019-08-29 16:14] – maja | dust_and_shadow:aesthetic_naturalism [2019-08-30 18:25] (current) – maja | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | |||
- | < | ||
- | Exercise:\\ | ||
- | mountain meets mountain \\ | ||
- | one was made by human, | ||
- | the other by something older. \\ | ||
- | the meeting is brokered by a human.\\ | ||
- | they meet at a neutral boundary \\ | ||
- | (an altered body of water)\\ | ||
- | wait. \\ | ||
- | |||
- | —Erika Hanson | ||
- | </ | ||
- | |||
- | |||
==== Nature' | ==== Nature' | ||
- | Excerpts from //" | + | Excerpts from //[[https:// |
---- | ---- | ||
Line 30: | Line 15: | ||
Both the artist and the saint are fully aware of the duality of their lives, that they live in a public world that cannot, in principle, understand the other and deeper world that claims their true allegiance. They are split and know it. Part of the force of their lives is that they must struggle heroically to heal this split through the means available to their psychological type. For the artist it is, of course, through art works that are publically available for appraisal and assimilation. For the saint, on the other hand, it is through a kind of higher action that is actually a non-action, a kind of Gelassenheit, | Both the artist and the saint are fully aware of the duality of their lives, that they live in a public world that cannot, in principle, understand the other and deeper world that claims their true allegiance. They are split and know it. Part of the force of their lives is that they must struggle heroically to heal this split through the means available to their psychological type. For the artist it is, of course, through art works that are publically available for appraisal and assimilation. For the saint, on the other hand, it is through a kind of higher action that is actually a non-action, a kind of Gelassenheit, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | —Erika Hanson | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 36: | Line 26: | ||
Fungi are ideal guides. Fungi have always been recalcitrant to the iron cage of self-replication. Like bacteria, some are given to exchanging genes in nonreproductive encounters (“horizontal gene transfer”); | Fungi are ideal guides. Fungi have always been recalcitrant to the iron cage of self-replication. Like bacteria, some are given to exchanging genes in nonreproductive encounters (“horizontal gene transfer”); | ||
- | —Anna Lowenhaupt Tsing. The Mushroom at the End of the World | + | < |
</ | </ | ||
Line 44: | Line 34: | ||
We are all inhabitants of the same mudscape, the same geological sludge, as it were. Anthropocene landscapes of death and extinction are, however, also inhabited by emergent and unexpected constellations of life, nonlife, and afterlife. Before mud becomes our only future, we need to learn from stones to notice all the forms of life and possibility that exist in the midst of death: that, as I see it, is the message and the magic of the geology of the present. | We are all inhabitants of the same mudscape, the same geological sludge, as it were. Anthropocene landscapes of death and extinction are, however, also inhabited by emergent and unexpected constellations of life, nonlife, and afterlife. Before mud becomes our only future, we need to learn from stones to notice all the forms of life and possibility that exist in the midst of death: that, as I see it, is the message and the magic of the geology of the present. | ||
- | —Nils Bubandt, Haunted Geologies, in Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet | + | < |
</ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 52: | Line 46: | ||
We seek to cultivate a sensibility that attunes us not only to the “now” of the weather, but towards ourselves and the world as weather bodies, mutually caught up in the whirlwind of a weather-world, | We seek to cultivate a sensibility that attunes us not only to the “now” of the weather, but towards ourselves and the world as weather bodies, mutually caught up in the whirlwind of a weather-world, | ||
- | —Astrida Neimanis and Rachel Loewen Walker, Weathering | + | < |
</ | </ | ||
Line 60: | Line 54: | ||
For the so-called environmental crisis is now more our everyday reality as climate, as even newspapers move from discussing natural disasters to the normalization of “weird weather.” As such it feels too ordinary in its weirdness to be a crisis. Moreover, the force of destruction is simply the political and social organization of human life. | For the so-called environmental crisis is now more our everyday reality as climate, as even newspapers move from discussing natural disasters to the normalization of “weird weather.” As such it feels too ordinary in its weirdness to be a crisis. Moreover, the force of destruction is simply the political and social organization of human life. | ||
- | —Anthony Paul Smith, A Non-Philosophical Theory of Nature | + | < |
</ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 68: | Line 66: | ||
We're going to gradually normalize climate change, one bit of weirdness at a time. | We're going to gradually normalize climate change, one bit of weirdness at a time. | ||
- | —Venkatesh Rao | + | < |
</ | </ | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Dust and Shadow Reader [[reader_2|Vol. 2]]. Previous: [[shinto]]. Next: [[risk of gaia]] | Dust and Shadow Reader [[reader_2|Vol. 2]]. Previous: [[shinto]]. Next: [[risk of gaia]] |