I'll never need to learn a falsehood list, so I can skip it.
A falsehood list is complete at the time of writing.
OK, but it will surely get updated with new falsehoods and clarifications.
Skimming the falsehood list is all I need to do to learn it.
OK, but surely I'll remember to recheck the falsehood list once I actually need to, right?
If a falsehood doesn't immediately make sense to me, there must be something wrong with it, despite the author having domain expertise that I don't.
“Edge cases” live only at the edges; they never creep into the middle.
These lists are meant to be for entertainment only