This is an old revision of the document!

A proposed project can be considered a FoAM project if the answer is YES to a few of these questions (as of 02010). . ..

• does it deal with issues of resilience?
• does it focus on whole lifecycle?
• does it approach complex issues from different perspectives?
• does it encourage unholy alliances?
• can it function as a connector between disciplines, or a 'trojan horse'?
• will it engage people from a field that is unknown to you and/or FoAM?
• does it have a (pseudo)scientific or technological element?
• is it playful?
• will it provide a pause, a fresh breath, an opening, a moment of stillness in people's lives?
• does it encourage participation?
• does it include moments of reflection?
• are you personally committed to engaging in this project?
• does it create a world - a total or complete, synaesthetic experience?

If the answer is YES to any of the following questions, it shouldn't be considered as a FoAM project without some changes

• is it one dimensional (i.e. is it dealing with a single issue, using a single approach, by a single individual)
• is it wasteful (in terms of human & electrical energy, waste products, time…)
• is it unsustainable (environmentally, socially, culturally)?
• does it focus on producing an artefact for its own sake (without taking the whole lifecycle of the artefact into account)?
• is it one-directional (i.e. is it 'for' people instead of 'with' people)?
• does it require a big, expensive production to produce a temporary result (e.g. a large installation on a 2 day festival)
• does it separate thinkers from implementers?
• does it treat scientists & technologists as technicians, artists & designers as 'prettifiers', or crafts and trade's people as mere 'manual labour'?
• […]