This is an old revision of the document!
If you are thinking of starting a project at FoAM, here's a list of questions to ask yourself:
A proposed project can be considered a FoAM project if the answer is YES to at least one of these questions (as of 02010) - the more, the better:
does it approach complex issues from different perspectives?
does it encourage 'unholy alliances' (connections between unexpected fields, cultures and worldviews)?
can it function as a connector, or a 'trojan horse' - between disciplines, people, philosophies…?
will it engage people from a field that is unknown to you and/or FoAM?
does it have a (pseudo)scientific or technological element?
is it playful?
does it foster speculative culture?
will it provide a pause, a fresh breath, an opening, a moment of stillness in people's lives?
does it encourage participation?
does it include moments of reflection?
are you personally committed to engaging in this project?
does it create a world - a total or complete, synaesthetic experience?
does it focus on whole lifecycle and has a holistic worldview?
If the answer is YES to any of the following questions, the project could not be considered by FoAM without substantial changes:
is it one dimensional (i.e. is it dealing with a single issue, using a single approach, by a single individual)?
is it wasteful (in terms of human & electrical energy, waste products, time…)?
is it unsustainable (environmentally, socially, culturally)?
does it focus on producing an artefact for its own sake (without taking the whole lifecycle of the artefact into account)?
is it one-directional (i.e. is it 'for' people instead of 'with' people)?
does it require a big, expensive production to produce a temporary result (e.g. a large installation on a 2 day festival)?
does it separate thinkers from makers?
does it treat scientists & technologists as technicians, artists & designers as 'prettifiers', or crafts and trade's people as mere 'manual labour'?
[…]