Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| foragemarkuplanguage [2010-10-07 11:41] – 145.50.39.12 | foragemarkuplanguage [2010-10-27 10:39] (current) – 145.50.39.11 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
| Surely there are better ways to do it. IF AT ALL: should newcomers/ | Surely there are better ways to do it. IF AT ALL: should newcomers/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | -Discussion- | ||
| + | [Joey] I think a markup language could indeed aid the data problem. But I would recommend some adjustments: | ||
| + | 1. maybe the tag plant could be changed to edible or species. Since there are related data collections which also mark edibles like fish or other non-plant like edibles/ | ||
| + | 2. I would expand the < | ||
| + | Maybe even an optional further classification of the type of media, jpg, | ||
| + | this would like like this: | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | 3. Also I would like to support the community aspect more. While the observer is described, it would like to also have further identification of the observer. Like a personal page of id. (facebook?) or just an url on the original foraging site. This way we can give credits to those who should get the credits. An in the future grand them special moderator or even admin rights according to their accuracy and/or amount of contribution | ||
| + | So the observer tag could be like this: | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | 4. Last I would vote for the KML way of describing a location, since I seems to me easier to implement, and relying on spaces in xml is in my experience a possibility for a lot of errors. | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | Joey: cheers, all fair points. The observer desires to be observered, also for trust-issues, | ||
| + | It makes sense to broaden the tag from plant to species, but, on the other hand, only plants stay where they are, and the augmentation annotation model works because it localizes resources with extreme precision. Also, when you open up for all species you may want to inlude another tag to record plant, fish, tree of whatever. | ||
| + | an example file would be: | ||
| + | | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| | | ||
145.50.39.12