Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
future_fabulators:capstones_workshop_debrief [2014-02-10 06:26] – majafuture_fabulators:capstones_workshop_debrief [2014-02-10 06:27] (current) – maja
Line 30: Line 30:
   * creating scenario skeletons needs 2 experienced facilitators to keep the dynamic conversation flowing. it was a bit difficult for me to keep writing, summarising and pulling relevant ideas out of the group.    * creating scenario skeletons needs 2 experienced facilitators to keep the dynamic conversation flowing. it was a bit difficult for me to keep writing, summarising and pulling relevant ideas out of the group. 
   * when writing down the axes, they need to be crystal clear and the group has to agree they all understand the same thing, otherwise the scenarios remain too vague and inconsistent. we made two scenarios with one of the axes unclear, but we corrected it during the break, then revisited the scenarios we made to clarify them - which seemed to be quite a relief after some confusion (the first axes was low transformation <-> radical transformation, the second incremental/phased impact <-> radical transformation of lifestyles). spend more time on crafting the wording of the axes.   * when writing down the axes, they need to be crystal clear and the group has to agree they all understand the same thing, otherwise the scenarios remain too vague and inconsistent. we made two scenarios with one of the axes unclear, but we corrected it during the break, then revisited the scenarios we made to clarify them - which seemed to be quite a relief after some confusion (the first axes was low transformation <-> radical transformation, the second incremental/phased impact <-> radical transformation of lifestyles). spend more time on crafting the wording of the axes.
-  * the second day we split the group in 4, so we gave written exercises per group and walked around helping when needed. this meant that the facilitator(s) could not have an overview of everything that went on in each group and could not support the process sufficiently. For example, the "//5 whys//" wasn't sufficiently challenging the status quo in some groups, perhaps because the students were asking the questions and the sponsors were answering - and the students didn't dare prod deeper; some of the core questions could have been more clearly phrased; one group had difficulties with "how to get from here to there"; the role-playing sessions weren't sufficiently scenario-specific, etc. +  * the second day we split the group in 4, so we gave written exercises per group and walked around helping when needed. this meant that the facilitator(s) could not have an overview of everything that went on in each group and could not support the process sufficiently. For example, the "//5 whys//" wasn't sufficiently challenging the status quo in some groups, perhaps because the students were asking the questions and the sponsors were answering - and the students didn't dare prod deeper; some of the core questions could have been more clearly phrased; one group had difficulties with "//how to get from here to there//"; the role-playing sessions weren't sufficiently scenario-specific, etc. 
  
  
  • future_fabulators/capstones_workshop_debrief.1392013583.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2014-02-10 06:26
  • by maja