Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
future_fabulators:future_fabulators_legacy [2013-12-17 12:31] – Page name changed from future_fabulators:scenario_design_201310 to future_fabulators:future_fabulators_legacy majafuture_fabulators:future_fabulators_legacy [2015-05-20 10:52] (current) nik
Line 11: Line 11:
 This 3 hour long session was designed as a warm-up of the kick-off meeting, before delving into administrative and logistical details. The aim was to allow the group to explore the goals and activities of the project outside of the narrow funding guidelines. We started from aspects that are fixed (such as the locations, financing people, experiments, activities etc.), looked at factors that could make the project succeed or fail, broadened the view with external macro-trends and ended with four possible scenarios that could emerge beyond the project's end date. In this session scenario building was used primarily as an ice-breaker, a method to get to know the people in the consortium, hear their perspectives on the larger context of the project, as well as its long view. It also made apparent the participants' creative, analytical and collaborative skills and interests.  This 3 hour long session was designed as a warm-up of the kick-off meeting, before delving into administrative and logistical details. The aim was to allow the group to explore the goals and activities of the project outside of the narrow funding guidelines. We started from aspects that are fixed (such as the locations, financing people, experiments, activities etc.), looked at factors that could make the project succeed or fail, broadened the view with external macro-trends and ended with four possible scenarios that could emerge beyond the project's end date. In this session scenario building was used primarily as an ice-breaker, a method to get to know the people in the consortium, hear their perspectives on the larger context of the project, as well as its long view. It also made apparent the participants' creative, analytical and collaborative skills and interests. 
  
-{{>https://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/10190865095/}} +<html><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/10190891016/" title="L1007117 by _foam, on Flickr"><img src="https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3743/10190891016_444bd3c3c6_b.jpg" width="1024" height="516" alt="L1007117"></a></html>
-// //+
  
-Two scenario axes that were chosen during the exercise: stable climate <-> climate chaos; dynamic stability <-> perpetual crisis. The following four scenarios were created:+Two scenario axes that were chosen during the exercise: stable climate <-> climate chaos; dynamic stability <-> perpetual crisis. The following [[future_fabulators_legacy_scenarios|four scenarios]] were created:
  
   * [[culture_as_society]]   * [[culture_as_society]]
Line 25: Line 24:
  
 Both scenario building sessions were experiments, looking at different durations, inclusion / exclusions of steps from [[:resilients:prehearsal_pocket_guide]] and aims for the scenarios. The process was briefly evaluated on the last day of the meeting and recorded in the [[scenario_design_debrief_20131013|Process debrief notes]] Both scenario building sessions were experiments, looking at different durations, inclusion / exclusions of steps from [[:resilients:prehearsal_pocket_guide]] and aims for the scenarios. The process was briefly evaluated on the last day of the meeting and recorded in the [[scenario_design_debrief_20131013|Process debrief notes]]
 +
 +{{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/10190865095/}}
 +// //
 +
 +
 +----
 +
 +Back to [[scenarios]]
  
  
  • future_fabulators/future_fabulators_legacy.1387283474.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2013-12-17 12:31
  • by maja