Future Fabulators
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| future_fabulators:integral_futures [2025-10-01 14:44] – nik | future_fabulators:integral_futures [2025-10-02 06:42] (current) – nik | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| From [[http:// | From [[http:// | ||
| - | < | + | | {{future_fabulators: |
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| Chris Stewart applied Integral Theory to scenario planning. He suggested that the two most important criteria for scenarios are relevance and diversity of worldviews to provide appropriate depth and breadth. He proposed a generic scenario method using Integral and provided case study examples. His article provided the foundation for the four quadrant model along with principle of practice (POP) for incorporating them into a generic scenario method model. | Chris Stewart applied Integral Theory to scenario planning. He suggested that the two most important criteria for scenarios are relevance and diversity of worldviews to provide appropriate depth and breadth. He proposed a generic scenario method using Integral and provided case study examples. His article provided the foundation for the four quadrant model along with principle of practice (POP) for incorporating them into a generic scenario method model. | ||
| - | Slaughter (…) imparts an observation of how Integral Theory has enhanced the futurist’s techniques for scenarios, environmental scanning, the T-cycle, and causal layered analysis. For scenarios and scenario planning, ‘In summary, the integral approach allows us to take scenario planning to a new and more capable stage of development. It means that we can go a long way beyond simple, pragmatic ‘mental models’ and the ‘generic business idea’ (themselves innovations in their time) to framing perceptions and the developmental capacities that underlie them. It also means that researchers and scenario planners can be more aware of the multitude of ways in which their own enculturation and interior development directly and profoundly affect everything they do.’ </ | + | Slaughter (…) imparts an observation of how Integral Theory has enhanced the futurist’s techniques for scenarios, environmental scanning, the T-cycle, and causal layered analysis. For scenarios and scenario planning, ‘In summary, the integral approach allows us to take scenario planning to a new and more capable stage of development. It means that we can go a long way beyond simple, pragmatic ‘mental models’ and the ‘generic business idea’ (themselves innovations in their time) to framing perceptions and the developmental capacities that underlie them. It also means that researchers and scenario planners can be more aware of the multitude of ways in which their own enculturation and interior development directly and profoundly affect everything they do.’ |
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| From: [[http:// | From: [[http:// | ||
| Line 56: | Line 58: | ||
| ==== Embodied Foresight ==== | ==== Embodied Foresight ==== | ||
| - | < | ||
| - | [[http:// | + | via [[http:// |
| At the heart of an integral approach to any sphere of activity and inquiry is inclusion of the greatest possible number of perspectives, | At the heart of an integral approach to any sphere of activity and inquiry is inclusion of the greatest possible number of perspectives, | ||
| Line 122: | Line 123: | ||
| Embodied Foresight has anticipatory, | Embodied Foresight has anticipatory, | ||
| - | Futures Studies methods equip practitioners with the power to have real-world impacts with unforeseeable second- and third-order systemic effects. Integral Futures frameworks and models have the potential to ' | + | Futures Studies methods equip practitioners with the power to have real-world impacts with unforeseeable second- and third-order systemic effects. Integral Futures frameworks and models have the potential to ' |
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| From [[http:// | From [[http:// | ||