Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
future_fabulators:integral_scenario_development [2014-03-03 06:47] – created maja | future_fabulators:integral_scenario_development [2014-03-04 07:23] (current) – maja | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==== Integral Scenario Development ==== | ==== Integral Scenario Development ==== | ||
- | + | How to develop scenarios inspired by [[integral futures]] methods and principles? C.C. Stewart offers some interesting ideas in [[http:// | |
- | Notes from [[http:// | + | |
< | < | ||
Line 14: | Line 13: | ||
Lining up as many types of holons and their associated holarchies as he could find in different disciplines, | Lining up as many types of holons and their associated holarchies as he could find in different disciplines, | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
The core value of the quadrants is they allowed Wilber to align the different types of truth statements, or orientating generalisations, | The core value of the quadrants is they allowed Wilber to align the different types of truth statements, or orientating generalisations, | ||
Line 20: | Line 21: | ||
In each quadrant different lines, or different holarchies are unfolding. | In each quadrant different lines, or different holarchies are unfolding. | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
Taken together these elements provide the foundations of the IS approach known as AQAL meta- theory. Holons, their holarchies, the quadrants they exist in, their levels and differentiating lines form the main elements we will consider within this essay, and refer to as AQAL. | Taken together these elements provide the foundations of the IS approach known as AQAL meta- theory. Holons, their holarchies, the quadrants they exist in, their levels and differentiating lines form the main elements we will consider within this essay, and refer to as AQAL. | ||
Line 54: | Line 57: | ||
It is common that each subject-holon of focus for the scenario process will be phrased as a question containing an actor (' | It is common that each subject-holon of focus for the scenario process will be phrased as a question containing an actor (' | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
Here the concepts of levels of a holarchy, and lines of holarchies within, or relevant to, the holon- subject of focus, can be employed. The developmental sequence nature implied by the definition of a holon in constructing a holarchy leads to the next root questions. Because a holon is a whole part, once a subject-holon is identified as a whole, it begs the question of what is it a part? And similarly, what wholes are a part of it? The answers to these questions facilitate organisation of the responses to the first six root questions. This can be summarised as two holarchy root questions: QQ is internal to X? QQ is X internal to? Where ' | Here the concepts of levels of a holarchy, and lines of holarchies within, or relevant to, the holon- subject of focus, can be employed. The developmental sequence nature implied by the definition of a holon in constructing a holarchy leads to the next root questions. Because a holon is a whole part, once a subject-holon is identified as a whole, it begs the question of what is it a part? And similarly, what wholes are a part of it? The answers to these questions facilitate organisation of the responses to the first six root questions. This can be summarised as two holarchy root questions: QQ is internal to X? QQ is X internal to? Where ' | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
In addition to the six root questions and two root holarchy questions, the POP can further add rigour to this approach. Using the POP as guiding policies or rules of engagement was identified above as a means of conducting an ISD. Another, complimentary approach, would be to derive questions from them as well. Nonexclusion could lead to asking 'Have we sought out as many relevant perspectives as possible?' | In addition to the six root questions and two root holarchy questions, the POP can further add rigour to this approach. Using the POP as guiding policies or rules of engagement was identified above as a means of conducting an ISD. Another, complimentary approach, would be to derive questions from them as well. Nonexclusion could lead to asking 'Have we sought out as many relevant perspectives as possible?' | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
Once the variables are identified using the root questions, linked via holarchy questions, and rigorously checked using the POPs as questions, an integrated and ordered picture concerning the master subject-holon should emerge. Using AQAL questions and mapping facilitates the information gathering and analysis process and covers the majority of the first two steps of the generic scenario development process | Once the variables are identified using the root questions, linked via holarchy questions, and rigorously checked using the POPs as questions, an integrated and ordered picture concerning the master subject-holon should emerge. Using AQAL questions and mapping facilitates the information gathering and analysis process and covers the majority of the first two steps of the generic scenario development process | ||
Line 63: | Line 72: | ||
What remains in 'Step 2' is to rank the variables in a manner consistent with a chosen scenario creation method. | What remains in 'Step 2' is to rank the variables in a manner consistent with a chosen scenario creation method. | ||
- | root questions and the AQAL picture of relevant variables can be used as either prompts and/or as a checklist in the creation of the scenario ' | + | root questions and the AQAL picture of relevant variables can be used as either prompts and/or as a checklist in the creation of the scenario ' |
+ | |||
+ | A later article (still to read) can be found here: http:// | ||
+ | related: [[integral futures]] [[scenario methods]] |