This is an old revision of the document!
(workshop at FTA 2014 - 27 NOV 2014)
short summary workshop “New approaches in FTA / foresight” at the EU FTA conference, November 2014
New Approaches
4 major clusters:
+ IT-based / "automated” foresight (in early stages, to be used with a "disclaimer” because of the current hype, experiences still have to be evaluated and sense-making still not generated;) Relies strongly on having had a precise "question" / task before starting + Integrated qualitative-quantitative approaches. Few examples, debated how far foresight should go - should never succumb to the traditional numbers dominance + Open and Crowdsourced - Lots of potential also in terms of who funds foresight and how - crowdfunding possibilities e.g. for regional / community foresight - Quite widespread in terms of open approaches + New forms of communication: Storytelling / Visualization / Gaming: - Here, we had the most real "new" examples, e.g. from overlaps / working with Design Fiction, Experiential Foresight (Roleplaying), "Tangible Foresight" ("Exhibitions" / Futures Windows; Objects from the future, ...) - Major potential for improving the impact / establishing new routes to engagement - Further Trends / Tendencies: Impacts Assessment; Focus on Pre-Foresight-Phase (Conceptualization); Tailor-Made Foresight / Test-driving and then adapting approaches / Stochastic tinkering for finding best approach; Cluster / cross-sectoral foresight; Open Innovation Foresight ; Meta-Trend = towards hybrid / combined approaches - new application fields also emerging, e.g. society-wide foresight, e.g. with kids; or foresight for therapy, …
New or Unmet Needs in Foresight
Where are new needs?
Need for Shared Theoretical Background / Futures Literacy / practical principles
Tools and Skills Needs
Lots of room for improvement in realm of implementing results / link to decision-making
Foresight 2030
Who pays for foresight in 2030? Alongside a traditional commissioning model by corporations and governments, crowd funded foresight occurs when groups of individuals involved in communities/advocacy come together to co-fund the foresight projects they really want to see
Overall insight, across all 3 groups / topics: New approaches are developing rapidly, especially from working with / overlaps with approaches from other disciplines. The (partly normative) discussion in the community is still missing on which new approaches to push where and for what specific purpose, or where / how to also “counteract” trends and safeguard foresight depth and quality levels.