Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
future_fabulators:notes_from_bbb13 [2013-11-12 13:04] – Pratchett! section timbo | future_fabulators:notes_from_bbb13 [2013-11-14 09:46] – tina.auer | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
Delius: " | Delius: " | ||
+ | Stepahn Schwans addition / objection here was, that *participation can be segregating* as well. Especially if participation becomes a requirement for contribution and/or basic reception of content. | ||
+ | Furthermore he brought up the issue, that participation - especially within edutainmaint - most of the times stays rather flat and is far away from intensifying an expierence. | ||
**Museum als Möglichkeitsform** | **Museum als Möglichkeitsform** | ||
Line 67: | Line 69: | ||
Danger of Augmented Reality: once we have created images (or worse, had them created for us), it is hard to emancipate ourselves from them. | Danger of Augmented Reality: once we have created images (or worse, had them created for us), it is hard to emancipate ourselves from them. | ||
- | Barriers: There are multiple levels of barriers to experiencing a work. Language, culture, technology. With the disappearance of barriers, works lose their meaning. BUT barriers may not be created to keep the non-elites outside. | + | *Barriers*: There are multiple levels of barriers to experiencing a work. Language, culture, technology. With the disappearance of barriers, works lose their meaning. BUT barriers may not be created to keep the non-elites outside. What was brought up here was, that the fact of " |
Question: Can an exhibition App ever get close to a Dandyesque performing curator or a discussion with an equally ignorant but interested friend as one moves through an exhibition, | Question: Can an exhibition App ever get close to a Dandyesque performing curator or a discussion with an equally ignorant but interested friend as one moves through an exhibition, | ||
Line 116: | Line 118: | ||
She often talked about writers as vital and professional, | She often talked about writers as vital and professional, | ||
+ | === Expanded Radio / Expanded Narration === | ||
+ | Sabine Breitsamer - Professor of Sound and Media Culture in the Department of Media at Hochschule Darmstadt and is a co-founder of the Masters program "Sound Studies" | ||
+ | * she gave an historic overview of the development of radio play & radio dramas - which she defines as " | ||
+ | * furthermore she has shown the development from mono-directional towards tow-way communication usage of radio | ||
+ | Examples: | ||
+ | * 1924 Hans Flesch - *Zauberei auf dem Sender* - [[http:// | ||
+ | * 1929 Walter Ruttmann - *Weekend* - | ||
+ | * an acoustic picture of a Berlin weekend urban landscape [[https:// | ||
+ | * 1969 Richard Hey SWF - audience participation (through phonecalls) / choosing the path of development of the story told | ||
+ | * 1969 Alvin Lucier - *I'm sitting in a room* [[https:// | ||
+ | * 1980 peak-time of radio performance; | ||
+ | * 1996 Tina Casani & Bruno Beusch; they founded *Radio TNC* (1995). Interactive media fiction The Great Web Crash - 2 year lasting radio-play. | ||
+ | * Citation of *Gene Youngblood* at the end (which I haven' | ||
+ | * interesting note during discussion: participation was brought up again - Breitsamer misses " |