Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- future_fabulators:scenario_methods [2014-02-19 05:44] – maja
+++ future_fabulators:scenario_methods [2014-02-19 05:57] – nik
@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 Finally, an interesting avenue to explore are remote scenario planning workshops using various online collaboration tools. Jamais Cascio describes [[http://www.openthefuture.com/2007/01/the_virtual_workshop_or_how_to.html|here]] how he conducted a virtual scenario workshop, Noah Raford describes another [[http://noahraford.com/?p=414|experiment]] in [[http://news.noahraford.com/?p=650|online scenario planning]].
+----
 Below we explore different elements of scenario building, ask questions that emerged from our practice and investigate methods that might be used to improve the process.
@@ Line 194: / Line 198: @@
   * which methods could we use to prototype possible futures?
-More on [[possible_futures_parallel_presents]] and [[experiential futurism]]
+More on [[possible_futures_parallel_presents]] and [[experiential futures]]
 ==== Prehearsals ====
@@ Line 218: / Line 222: @@
 From: [[https://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1558553&show=html|Identifying systems' new initial conditions as influence points for the future]]
+==== Analysis, Summaries and comparisons====
+Using four different scenario building methods: the 2x2 matrix approach; causal layered analysis; the Manoa approach; and the scenario archetypes approach. "This exploratory comparison confirmed that different scenario generation methods yield not only different narratives and insights, but qualitatively different participant experiences. "
+Curry, Andrew and Wendy Schultz (2009), “Roads Less Travelled,” Journal of Futures Studies, Vol. 13(4). http://www.jfs.tku.edu.tw/13-4/AE03.pdf