Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
future_fabulators:scenario_methods [2014-02-19 06:47] – [Scenarios] maja | future_fabulators:scenario_methods [2014-02-19 06:54] – [Analysis, Summaries and comparisons] maja | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
< | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Morphological Analysis]] is a way to create one normative scenario, from which a number of critical uncertainties are selected and given a set of variables; by combining different variables several ' | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Anna Maria Orru and David Relan wrote [[:/ | Anna Maria Orru and David Relan wrote [[:/ | ||
Line 34: | Line 40: | ||
- | ---- | + | ==== Analysis, Summaries and comparisons==== |
+ | |||
+ | Using four different scenario building methods: the 2x2 matrix approach; causal layered analysis; the Manoa approach; and the scenario archetypes approach. "This exploratory comparison confirmed that different scenario generation methods yield not only different narratives and insights, but qualitatively different participant experiences. " | ||
+ | |||
+ | Curry, Andrew and Wendy Schultz (2009), “Roads Less Travelled, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | "The paper to review all the techniques for developing scenarios that have appeared in the literature, along with comments on their utility, strengths and weaknesses. [...] eight categories of techniques that include a total of 23 variations used to develop scenarios. There are descriptions and evaluations for each." | ||
+ | |||
+ | Bishop, Peter, Andy Hines and Terry Collins (2007), “The current state of scenario development: | ||
+ | http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Scenario Building Components ==== | ||
- | Below we explore different elements of scenario building, ask questions that emerged from our practice and investigate methods that might be used to improve the process. | + | Below we explore different elements of scenario building |
Line 222: | Line 243: | ||
Mapping scenarios techniques. (Source: Andrew Curry) | Mapping scenarios techniques. (Source: Andrew Curry) | ||
- | ==== Analysis, Summaries and comparisons==== | ||
- | |||
- | Using four different scenario building methods: the 2x2 matrix approach; causal layered analysis; the Manoa approach; and the scenario archetypes approach. "This exploratory comparison confirmed that different scenario generation methods yield not only different narratives and insights, but qualitatively different participant experiences. " | ||
- | |||
- | Curry, Andrew and Wendy Schultz (2009), “Roads Less Travelled, | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | "The paper to review all the techniques for developing scenarios that have appeared in the literature, along with comments on their utility, strengths and weaknesses. [...] eight categories of techniques that include a total of 23 variations used to develop scenarios. There are descriptions and evaluations for each." | ||
- | |||
- | Bishop, Peter, Andy Hines and Terry Collins (2007), “The current state of scenario development: | ||
- | http:// | ||
- | |||
- | "In my experience, scenario planning is an interpretive practice – it’s really closer to magic than technique. ... Look long enough, hard enough, and the pieces will fall into place. Magic is a very difficult thing – most people spend their whole life cutting magic out.” --Napier Collyns | ||