Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- future_fabulators:scenario_methods [2014-03-03 06:19] – [Scenario Methods] maja
+++ future_fabulators:scenario_methods [2014-03-03 06:40] – [Scenarios] maja
@@ Line 179: / Line 179: @@
-==== Plotting the present situation ====
+==== Plotting past and present ====
-//What are different ways to map-out the present situation surrounding the key question?//
+//What are different ways to map-out the past and present situation surrounding the key question?//
   * [[KPUU Framework]]
+  * 6 root questions (identify variables) 2 holarchy questions (link variables), different POP questions (check variables) from [[integral scenario development]]:
+    * (Subject of focus): When? Who/What? + (Actors and factors relating to the subject of focus): Who? Why? What/How? Where?
+    * Who is internal to X (organisation, community, project)? What is the X internal to? - this might help in clustering and structuring the map of the context
+    * 'Have we sought out as many relevant perspectives as possible?'
+    * 'Have we actively sought to identify (surface, objectify) the perspectives/mental models we have used in each stage of the process?' 'How might our perspectives effect what we have identified?' 'Are there others we haven't included?' 'Why not?'
+    * 'Have we identified relationships among the different variables identified?' 'Are there other evolutionary sequences and casual chains (vertical and horizontal relationships) that might link and summarise these variables?' 'How might these sequences be meta-linked?'
 //When to use this step?//
@@ Line 281: / Line 287: @@
 From [[http://www.jfs.tku.edu.tw/14-2/A01.pdf|Alternative Futures at The Manoa School]] by Jim Dator
+Another suggestion (from [[integral scenario development]] by Christ C Stewart:
+  * Apply 6 root questions (relating to factors and actors) and the AQAL framework (four quadrants by Wilber) to deepen the scenario stories