Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- future_fabulators:scenario_methods [2014-03-04 06:23] – maja
+++ future_fabulators:scenario_methods [2014-03-04 06:27] – maja
@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
   - Dimensions of uncertainty (morphological analysis, field anomaly relaxation, GBN, MORPHOL, OS/SE)
   - Cross-impact analysis (SMIC PROF-EXPERT, IFS)
-  - Modeling (trend impact analysis, sensitivity analysis, dynamic scenarios) </blockquote>
+  - Modeling (trend impact analysis, sensitivity analysis, dynamic scenarios)
+</blockquote>
 From [[http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/aboutus/whatwedo/PolicyAnalysis/UKHigherEducation/Futures/Documents/current_state_of_scenario_development_FORESIGHT.pdf|The current state of scenario development]] by Peter Bishop, Andy Hines and Terry Collins, Foresight, Vol. 9(1)
@@ Line 94: / Line 96: @@
 <blockquote>
-) Continue: What are the ways in which the system in which we find ourselves could continue as it is?
+) Continue: What are the ways in which the system in which we find ourselves could continue as it is?\\
-) Collapse: What are the ways in which it could fall apart?
+) Collapse: What are the ways in which it could fall apart?\\
-) Discipline: What are the ways in which it could be directed?
+) Discipline: What are the ways in which it could be directed?\\
-) Transform: What are the ways in which it could change altogether?
+) Transform: What are the ways in which it could change altogether?\\
 Phrased this way, each generic image of the future presents a challenge to test the boundaries of one’s expectations and understanding of the system.
 </blockquote>