Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
future_fabulators:visualising_the_invisible [2014-07-16 10:14] – maja | future_fabulators:visualising_the_invisible [2014-07-16 10:16] – maja | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==== Visualising The Invisible ==== | ==== Visualising The Invisible ==== | ||
- | {{> | + | Design today deals with many complex systems, including politics, economy, society, technology and the environment. Very often design is seen as a means for problem solving. However, designing |
+ | This workshop aims to explore the future problematics of visualizing the invisible, using scenario building and pre-enactments. | ||
- | === Framing === | + | {{> |
- | By Adam Nocek and Maja Kuzmanovic | ||
- | Design today deals with many complex systems, including politics, economy, society, technology and the environment. Very often design is seen as a means for problem solving. However, designing in and with complex systems means that many of the solutions generate new problems. So how do we design for thinking about problems, without necessarily dealing falling into the trap of solutionism. When thinking about problems, we can also think about future problematics (assumptions, | + | === Framing === |
Foresight and futures studies can be thought of visualisers of the ultimate invisible: the future. Contrary to common belief, foresight is not about predicting the future. It is much more about revealing assumptions and expectations, | Foresight and futures studies can be thought of visualisers of the ultimate invisible: the future. Contrary to common belief, foresight is not about predicting the future. It is much more about revealing assumptions and expectations, |