Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
future_fabulators:visualising_the_invisible [2014-07-16 12:43] – maja | future_fabulators:visualizing_the_invisible [2014-07-16 15:13] – Page name changed from future_fabulators:visualising_the_invisible to future_fabulators:visualizing_the_invisible maja | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Design today deals with many complex systems, including politics, economy, society, technology and the environment. Very often design is seen as a means for problem solving. However, designing in and with complex systems means that many of the solutions generate new problems. So how do we design for thinking about problems, without necessarily dealing falling into the trap of solutionism. When thinking about problems, we can also think about future problematics (assumptions, | Design today deals with many complex systems, including politics, economy, society, technology and the environment. Very often design is seen as a means for problem solving. However, designing in and with complex systems means that many of the solutions generate new problems. So how do we design for thinking about problems, without necessarily dealing falling into the trap of solutionism. When thinking about problems, we can also think about future problematics (assumptions, | ||
- | This workshop aims to explore the future problematics of visualizing the invisible, using scenario building and pre-enactments. | + | This workshop aims to explore the future problematics of visualizing the invisible, using scenario building and pre-enactments. The workshop was initiated and produced by Stacey Moran and Adam Nocek, It was facilitated by Maja Kuzmanovic and Nik Gaffney of FoAM Brussels and hosted in Amsterdam Midwest, thanks to Cocky Eek of FoAM Amsterdam who found the space. Participants were the students and faculty (and their daughters) of the University of Washington: Alex, Megan, Angel, Stacey, Karla, Devin, Nate, Hillery, Alyssa, Rachel, Adam, Tiffany, Rara, Hannah, Cindy, Saloni, Kate, Katie, Lars, Jon, Ivy, Fiona. |
{{> | {{> | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
{{> | {{> | ||
+ | |||
+ | On the [[visualising_the_invisible_process|process page]] you can find a more detailed description of the flow, questions and techniques used in the workshop. | ||
+ | |||
=== Core question === | === Core question === | ||
Line 39: | Line 42: | ||
What do we know? | What do we know? | ||
- | We visualize environments, | + | We visualize environments, |
What do we presume? | What do we presume? | ||
Line 144: | Line 147: | ||
=== Scenarios === | === Scenarios === | ||
- | * [[Franco]]: Radical openness and unsustainable homogenization. Everything is visualized and shared, but unseen due to massive ' | + | * [[franco]]: Radical openness and unsustainable homogenization. Everything is visualized and shared, but unseen due to massive ' |
{{> | {{> | ||
Line 162: | Line 165: | ||
More detailed scenario descriptions can be found on the four scenario pages. | More detailed scenario descriptions can be found on the four scenario pages. | ||
- | * [[Franco]] | + | * [[franco]] |
- | * [[Hal2020]] | + | * [[hal2020]] |
- | * [[Geriopolis]] | + | * [[geriopolis]] |
- | * [[Biopentopia]] | + | * [[biopentopia]] |
=== Appreciative Inquiry === | === Appreciative Inquiry === | ||
Line 218: | Line 221: | ||
* Abstracting | * Abstracting | ||
- | === Process === | ||
- | |||
- | A step by step [[visualising_the_invisible_process|process]] of the workshop. | ||
=== Reflection === | === Reflection === |