Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- future_fabulators:visualising_the_invisible [2014-07-16 12:48] – maja
+++ future_fabulators:visualising_the_invisible [2014-07-16 12:49] – maja
@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 {{>https://secure.flickr.com/photos/foam/14671733363/}} \\
-On the [[visualising_the_invisible_process|process page]] more detailed description of the steps, questions and techniques used in the workshop.
+On the [[visualising_the_invisible_process|process page]] more detailed description of the flow, questions and techniques used in the workshop.
@@ Line 42: / Line 42: @@
 What do we know?
-We visualize environments, ideologies, information, cities and people. We use tools and methods, often technological, to visualize the invisible. What is considered invisible is different for different people. Things can be invisible for specific individuals or specific groups of people; they can be fully or partially invisible.Invisibility is made by us, it is a subjective phenomenon, and can have elements of faith. Physical things can remind us of things that are invisible. Using technology to visualize the invisible has often much to do with priviledge and power. Visualizing the invisible has been a part of philosophy, reasoning and meaning-making.
+We visualize environments, ideologies, information, cities and people. We use tools and methods, often technological, to visualize the invisible. What is considered invisible is different for different people. Things can be invisible for specific individuals or specific groups of people; they can be fully or partially invisible.Invisibility is made by us, it is a subjective phenomenon, and can have elements of faith. Physical things can remind us of things that are invisible. Using technology to visualize the invisible has often much to do with privilege and power. Visualizing the invisible has been a part of philosophy, reasoning and meaning-making.
 What do we presume?