Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
ict_art_connect_2014 [2014-05-12 11:45] – [A few notes from the meeting] maja | ict_art_connect_2014 [2014-05-12 11:58] – [A few notes from the meeting] maja | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 227: | Line 227: | ||
* developing a website as an online platform for connections between ICT and art (http:// | * developing a website as an online platform for connections between ICT and art (http:// | ||
+ | Ralph Dum, project officer ICT&Art Connect | ||
+ | |||
+ | * The initial question was: why art? | ||
+ | * difficult question - instrumentalisation etc. | ||
+ | * to create innovative products? not tech but creativity driven | ||
+ | * how can artists contribute to innovation in EU? Human dimension, multiple worlds… | ||
+ | * science, arts and technology connected through physical artefacts (functionality, | ||
+ | * links art & science - common: curiosity & serendipity | ||
+ | * (social) change, communicate, | ||
+ | * artistic works in ICT&Art showed why is art important in the context of technology - e.g. big data, augmented reality, crowd (collective awareness, participation), | ||
+ | * EC: inclusion of artists in residence in different objectives: projects in IOT (internet of things), and other projects in Horizon 2020 - should become a standard practice in EC projects; dedicated call to ICT & Art (but for the time being it isn’t an evident choice… now still trying to find a rationale and see what is possible) | ||
+ | * important to have residencies on both sides - discussions with EACEA needed to see how scientists could work in arts organisations | ||
+ | * next step: artists a more central role in scientific practices | ||