Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| lirec_notes [2009-01-06 15:17] – davegriffiths | lirec_notes [2009-01-06 15:24] – davegriffiths | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
| - Reuse code across these platforms | - Reuse code across these platforms | ||
| - Support migration at runtime between platforms | - Support migration at runtime between platforms | ||
| - | |||
| - | Platforms can consist of 4 main types, mobile robot, fixed robot, handheld device or fixed graphical system. Each has it's inherent restrictions. | ||
| ==Existing robot architectures== | ==Existing robot architectures== | ||
| - | In the whole, there is a lack of sharing of this kind of technology. This is partly because generalising is hard in this field, considering all types of robots possible. However, Lirec has to generalise as it's using a wide variety of architectures. | + | In the whole, there has historically been a lack of sharing of this kind of technology. This is partly because generalising is hard, considering all types of robots possible. However, Lirec has to generalise as it's using a wide variety of architectures |
| - | NASREM/NIST RCS - NASA + ESA use a generic system with their subcontractors. | + | While some existing architectures are available, none of them address the needs of lirec, given the focus: |
| + | | ||
| + | - Working across different platforms | ||
| ==Methodology== | ==Methodology== | ||
nik