Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- lisp_on_osx [2007-06-12 13:14] – external edit 127.0.0.1
+++ lisp_on_osx [2007-07-12 13:31] – nik
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ===== Lisp and Mac OS X =====
-A comparison of various common lisp implementations which run on [[Mac
+A comparison of various common lisp implementations which run on [[MacOSX]].
-OSX]].
 (NOTE: freely lifted from Bill Clementson's Blog, which was in turn a summary of a c.l.l thread (or 2, or 3...) http://home.comcast.net/~bc19191/blog/050327.html still needing some wikification, clarification of the commentry, and so on...)
@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
-==== implementations [as of 2005] ====
-I run now, or have run, just about every common lisp that runs on Mac OS
-X. These include, in no particular order; Armed Bear Common Lisp (ABCL), Allegro Common Lisp (trial version), MCL, [[OpenMCL]], LispWorks< (4.4), CLISP, CMUCL, SBCL -- Raffael Cavallaro
+===== implementations [as of 2005] =====
+"I run now, or have run, just about every common lisp that runs on Mac OS
+X. These include, in no particular order; Armed Bear Common Lisp (ABCL), Allegro Common Lisp (trial version), MCL, [[OpenMCL]], LispWorks< (4.4), CLISP, CMUCL, SBCL" -- Raffael Cavallaro
@@ Line 94: / Line 96: @@
   * **Issues:** Not as widely used or developed/maintained on Mac OS X as its fork, SBCL.
   * **Features:** optimizing native compiler, callbacks. .
 ====SBCL====
@@ Line 105: / Line 108: @@
-----
+==== notes ====
 on the relative merits of MCL and LispWorks for Mac OS X development as well as the relative merits of Carbon/Cocoa for Mac development. http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/browse_frm/thread/fe598c3715c9b092/612ae11f7c1357a3#612ae11f7c1357a3