Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
luminous:publication_formatting [2020-06-06 05:13] – old revision restored (2008-02-29 08:01) 114.119.160.173 | luminous:publication_formatting [2020-06-06 12:00] (current) – old revision restored (2013-02-12 03:52) nik | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=== Format guide === | === Format guide === | ||
+ | |||
+ | aka Foam Publishing(tm) in-house style guidelines | ||
suggestions in consideration of the designer' | suggestions in consideration of the designer' | ||
Line 7: | Line 9: | ||
* cleaned up as much as possible (whitespace, | * cleaned up as much as possible (whitespace, | ||
* rtf format preserving local formatting only (bold, italics, etc.) | * rtf format preserving local formatting only (bold, italics, etc.) | ||
+ | * NOTE: ill have to check up on this, but i think either .txt or .doc are preferable, as indesign (if we are using it) does style, footnote and reference translation from .doc --nik | ||
* and optionally, basic style indications (headings, subheadings, | * and optionally, basic style indications (headings, subheadings, | ||
- | |||
== style/ | == style/ | ||
- | having become aware of a tendency to favour what turns out to be american english style options in many cases (despite best intentions), | + | following are some key texts which constitute signposts for any judgements |
- | --- // | + | |
- | + | ||
- | following are some key texts which constitute signposts for any such judgements, and rationales for editorial dictatorship. | + | |
* Ritter, R. M. 2002. //The Oxford Guide to Style.// Oxford University Press. | * Ritter, R. M. 2002. //The Oxford Guide to Style.// Oxford University Press. | ||
Line 23: | Line 22: | ||
* Angus, Joseph. 1862. //Hand-Book of the English Tongue: For the Use of Students and Others.// London: The Religious Tract Society. ;-) | * Angus, Joseph. 1862. //Hand-Book of the English Tongue: For the Use of Students and Others.// London: The Religious Tract Society. ;-) | ||
- | recognising that language is rarely amenable to totalitarianism, | + | ---- |
+ | === special notes === | ||
* citation style to be confirmed | * citation style to be confirmed |