Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- lgp_editorial:format_guide [2008-02-29 08:00] – alkan
+++ luminous:publication_formatting [2020-06-06 12:00] (current) – old revision restored (2013-02-12 03:52) nik
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 === Format guide ===
+aka Foam Publishing(tm) in-house style guidelines
 suggestions in consideration of the designer's convenience ;-)
@@ Line 7: / Line 9: @@
   * cleaned up as much as possible (whitespace, etc.)
   * rtf format preserving local formatting only (bold, italics, etc.)
+    * NOTE: ill have to check up on this, but i think either .txt or .doc are preferable, as indesign (if we are using it) does style, footnote and reference translation from .doc --nik
   * and optionally, basic style indications (headings, subheadings, body text)
 == style/formatting guidelines ==
-having become aware of a tendency to favour what turns out to be american english style options in many cases (despite best intentions), i am revising my outlook, which will consequently be reflected in some editorial suggestions concerning style matters herewith.
+following are some key texts which constitute signposts for any judgements in matters of style, and rationales for editorial dictatorship.
- --- //[[alkan.chipperfield@gmail.com|Alkan Chipperfield]] 2008/02/29 08:55//
-following are some key texts which constitute signposts for any such judgements, and rationales for editorial dictatorship.
   * Ritter, R. M. 2002. //The Oxford Guide to Style.// Oxford University Press.
@@ Line 23: / Line 22: @@
   * Angus, Joseph. 1862. //Hand-Book of the English Tongue: For the Use of Students and Others.// London: The Religious Tract Society. ;-)
-recognising that language is rarely amenable to totalitarianism, however, the following details exceptions, special cases, and matters to which particular attention may need to be drawn.
+----
+=== special notes ===
+  * citation style to be confirmed