This is an old revision of the document!
something which is probably not visible from the few articles yet:
- it should appeal to diverse audiences, should not have much 'jargon' (maggie's article is full of it!)
- it should reflect a 'luminous green' spirit and have a relatively lasting value as a record of current thinking and making
- it should go beyond documentation of individual projects and become a resource for people who would like to work and live in a 'luminous green way' (or something like that…)
(is that ok as a start?)