Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
manual:interviews:session1 [2016-08-22 12:59] michkamanual:interviews:session1 [2017-03-25 11:09] maja
Line 1: Line 1:
-====FoAM v0 - Starlab Cultural Department - ([?] [?])====+====FoAM v0 - Starlab Cultural Department - (March 2000 September 2000)====
  
 ===Members=== ===Members===
Line 12: Line 12:
      * Nik arrived just before bankruptcy      * Nik arrived just before bankruptcy
  
-====FoAM v1 - Starlab non-profit spin-off - ([?] Before october 2001 ? [?])====+====FoAM v1 - Starlab non-profit spin-off - (September 2000 June 2001)====
  
 ===Structure type=== ===Structure type===
Line 34: Line 34:
      * Maja helped design the mission of this spin-off, but they did not wanted her to be on the board      * Maja helped design the mission of this spin-off, but they did not wanted her to be on the board
  
-====FoAM v2 - Non-profit with possible commercial spin-offs - (After April 2002 [?] - 2010)===+====FoAM v2 - Non-profit with possible commercial spin-offs - (June 2001 March 2010)===
  
 ===Structure type=== ===Structure type===
Line 89: Line 89:
      * No residencies at that time      * No residencies at that time
  
-==FoAM v2.2 - (2006-2009)==+===FoAM v2.2 - (2006-2009)===
  
 ==Structure type== ==Structure type==
Line 123: Line 123:
              * [? TBChecked] FoAM had to manage 5 times its operational budget              * [? TBChecked] FoAM had to manage 5 times its operational budget
  
-====FoAM v3 - Funding-induced structural change - (2010 - now)====+====FoAM v3 - Funding-induced structural change - (2010 - 2016)====
  
 ===Structure type=== ===Structure type===
Line 217: Line 217:
                  * All partners were satisfied too                  * All partners were satisfied too
  
-   * The audit came ([?] for Grig ?) in 2012, and induced a breaking point +   * The audit came (for Grig) in 2012, and induced a breaking point 
-     * One year and half have been spent on the audit ([?] TBChecked+     * One year and half have been spent on the audit (March 2012-August 2013
-     * The first report from the auditors was asking 600 k€ back ([?] TBChecked) +     * The first report from the auditors was asking ~600 k€ back 
-     * At the end of the process, they were asking “only” 300 k€ back, but after a lot of work, stress, etc ([?] TBChecked)+     * At the end of the process, they were asking “only” 300 k€ back, but after a lot of work, stress, etc
  
    * In 2013, the decision was made to actively split nurturing activities and own work    * In 2013, the decision was made to actively split nurturing activities and own work
  • manual/interviews/session1.txt
  • Last modified: 2018-01-15 05:54
  • by 118.210.12.173