This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| marine_colab:system_change_experiment [2015-03-16 10:31] – nik | marine_colab:system_change_experiment [2015-04-28 16:34] (current) – nik | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==== System Change Experiment ==== | ==== System Change Experiment ==== | ||
| - | (an experiment from the [[workshop_201503|March workshop]]) | + | (an [[experiment]] from the [[workshop_201503|March workshop]]) |
| - | ===Hypothesis=== | + | ===Challenge/Hypothesis=== |
| - | {{> | + | What traction could we gain as a group if we focus on a single problem? Can we find a common issue to bring our respective resources to? How do we identify a tipping point?\\ |
| - | [[https:// | + | Notes: https:// |
| ===Experiment design=== | ===Experiment design=== | ||
| - | {{>https:// | + | |
| - | [[https:// | + | A pre-experiment investigation to understand what existing approaches have worked, what success factors, tools and motivations are around to create system change. |
| + | |||
| + | If system innovation is a set of interventions that come together: | ||
| + | * is it then possible to co-ordinate a set of disparate interventions (with different theories of change) to deliberately shift a system into a more sustainable state? when are these co-ordinated actions an improvement over individual uncoordinated activities? | ||
| + | * do levers come together in a way that can add value? | ||
| + | * what impact could we hope for? How do we measure this? | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{>http:// | ||
| + | [[http:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | (Expected) Outcome: | ||
| + | * identified issues and tipping points | ||
| + | * road map of tools, effects and approaches to use and [timings?] united (reflection on what has/ | ||
| + | * possible future experiment for a strategic set of interventions or projects designed/ | ||
| + | * framework/ | ||
| + | * visual theory of change | ||
| + | * low tech and low cost documentation | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Implementation === | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Ideally everyone can be included at different points | ||
| + | * Allow common evaluation with some kind of format/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. Horizon scan for tipping points, future opportunities, | ||
| + | * WG review of information (like-minded or interested people to reflect/ | ||
| + | * help uncovering emerging issues | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2. Explore overlap of interests and scenarios for action (Venn diagrams of interests) | ||
| + | |||
| + | 3. Go/no go check (feasibility) | ||
| + | |||
| + | 4. Architect to design and [innovate? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Resources: | ||
| + | * staff time (commission others outside of the group for research) | ||
| + | * separate meeting | ||
| + | * buy-in/ | ||
| + | * willingness to open up strategies | ||
| + | * review of potential options to test logic, feasibility, | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Needs == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Contributions of knowledge and learning to identify components of behaviour change; case studies, reflection, stories, suggestions, | ||
| + | * Come to group discussion | ||
| + | * Buy-in to horizon scanning and where [xxx] to intervene | ||
| + | * Suggestion of others outside of the group | ||
| + | * Testing the logic | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Offers == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * MVL: Time, examples, analysis, [Lessons learned?], horizon scanning | ||
| + | * Nic: My time, reflection on past experiences, | ||
| + | * Andrew Farmer: Horizon scanning, meetings | ||
| + | * Amy: Time, ideas, experiences, | ||
| + | * Sue: review of success and what has worked | ||
| + | * NEF: share our experience, lessons in campaigning, | ||
| + | * SL: Review of lessons learned, horizon scanning [+planning? | ||
| + | * Louisa [intelligence? | ||
| + | * Giles: System [xxx] architecture, | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===Progress=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Results=== | ||