Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
marine_colab:valuing_what_matters_experiment [2015-03-16 16:12] nikmarine_colab:valuing_what_matters_experiment [2015-04-27 15:35] (current) nik
Line 1: Line 1:
 ==== 'Valuing What Matters' Experiment ==== ==== 'Valuing What Matters' Experiment ====
  
-(an experiment from the [[workshop_201503|March workshop]])+(an [[experiment]] from the [[workshop_201503|March workshop]])
  
 ===Hypothesis / Challenge=== ===Hypothesis / Challenge===
  
-{{>https://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/16831952875/}}\\+Changing perceptions of marine conservation.\\ 
 +Notes: https://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/16831952875/\\ 
  
 ===Experiment design=== ===Experiment design===
  
-{{>https://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/16624611407}} +Experiment 3 to change perceptions of marine conservation (NGOs)\\ 
-[[https://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/16624611407|full size image]]+See also: [[charm offensive experiment]] and [[gone fishing in the Thames experiment]]
  
-Experiment to change perceptions of marine conservation (NGOs)+Experiment description: Create a scenario and trade-off analysis related to health costs. Finding a way to speak the language of policy makers by focusing on costs that are important to them, such as health costs. A cost/benefit analysis is needed. 
 + 
 +{{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/16624611407}} 
 +[[https://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/16624611407|full size image]]
  
-Create a scenario and trade-off analysis related to health costs. Finding a way to speak the language of policy makers by focusing on costs that are important to them, such as health costs. A cost/benefit analysis is needed. 
  
 Implementation: Implementation:
Line 20: Line 24:
   * collaboration between economics and marine conservation   * collaboration between economics and marine conservation
   * research what could be [sourced?] up in a credible way   * research what could be [sourced?] up in a credible way
 +
 +== Needs ==
 +
 +  * Good facilitators
 +  * Research time
 +  * Economic expertise
 +  * Community opinion leaders
 +  * party/event organiser
 +
 +== Offers ==
 +
 +  * Nic: FF’s experience at engaging communities/fishers; inputs to workshop; connections and networks of others working on the issue; possibility of peer exchange
 +  * Giles: Facilitation
 +  * MVL: Access to scientific experts if useful; case study feeding [xxxx] (Bloomberg)
 +  * Sue: developing, monitoring and evaluation tools to measure impact; time and research
 +  * Aniol: paella, economics [xxxx] connector [person?]
 +  * Andrew F: health benefits of Natura 2000
 +  * Andrew B.: Party, Valuing nature/health
 +  * Louisa: venue, info blue week, with [xxx], share experiences of [xxx]
 +  * Amy: taking the lead on 'gone fishing’; time, ideas, contacts for day out; time or sounding board for cultural 
  
  
Line 25: Line 49:
  
 ===Results=== ===Results===
 +
  
  • marine_colab/valuing_what_matters_experiment.1426522346.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2015-03-16 16:12
  • by nik