Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
marine_colab:workshop_201503 [2015-03-16 15:37] nikmarine_colab:workshop_201503 [2016-08-10 08:11] (current) nik
Line 1: Line 1:
-==== Marine CoLABoration Workshop - March 2015 ====+===== Marine CoLABoration Workshop - March 2015 =====
  
 +Second in a series of four scoping workshops, part of the [[start|Marine CoLaboration]] initiative on Valuing the Oceans, by the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation in London, UK.
  
-===Participants===+====Participants====
  
 Andrew Barnett, Louisa Hooper, Sandy Luk, Nicola Frost, Amy Pryor, Aniol Esteban, Giles Bristow, Sue Ranger, Andrew Farmer, Mirella von Lindenfels, Filipa Saldanha, Catarina Grilo, Sarah Ridley Andrew Barnett, Louisa Hooper, Sandy Luk, Nicola Frost, Amy Pryor, Aniol Esteban, Giles Bristow, Sue Ranger, Andrew Farmer, Mirella von Lindenfels, Filipa Saldanha, Catarina Grilo, Sarah Ridley
Line 8: Line 9:
 Facilitators: Maja Kuzmanovic, Vali Lalioti, Nik Gaffney Facilitators: Maja Kuzmanovic, Vali Lalioti, Nik Gaffney
  
-{{>https://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/16624651967/}} \\+{{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/16624651967/}} \\
  
  
-==== Framing ====+===== Framing =====
  
-=== Marine CoLAB: purpose, outline and opportunities ===+==== Marine CoLAB ====
  
-Framing by Louisa Hooper +The introduction from Louisa Hooper focused on the reasons why the Foundation decided to take the Marine CoLABoration approach and outline a possible trajectory and opportunities in the coming year. 
- +
-The introduction from Louisa Hooper focused on the reasons why the Foundation decided to take the Marine CoLABoration approach and outline a possible trajectory in the coming year. +
  
 The Gulbenkian Oceans Initiative was launched just over two years ago in Lisbon with a case study in Portugal and a range of public understanding and policy influencing initiatives. The focus has been on the economic valuation of marine ecosystem services. In the UK, the initiative was designed to connect to, promote and complement the work the Lisbon branch was engaged with, and also to address the needs and gaps specific to the UK. The initiative in the UK began with the commission of a scoping report from Forum for the Future, which suggested a number of critical issues, yet underlying them all was the need to make ocean issues more ‘human’ – to show people how and why the health of the ocean matters to them. The report showed that while there is a lot of information available, it is often 'siloed' in sectors and poorly communicated to those who may need it most. The Gulbenkian Oceans Initiative was launched just over two years ago in Lisbon with a case study in Portugal and a range of public understanding and policy influencing initiatives. The focus has been on the economic valuation of marine ecosystem services. In the UK, the initiative was designed to connect to, promote and complement the work the Lisbon branch was engaged with, and also to address the needs and gaps specific to the UK. The initiative in the UK began with the commission of a scoping report from Forum for the Future, which suggested a number of critical issues, yet underlying them all was the need to make ocean issues more ‘human’ – to show people how and why the health of the ocean matters to them. The report showed that while there is a lot of information available, it is often 'siloed' in sectors and poorly communicated to those who may need it most.
Line 31: Line 30:
 Looking ahead, by the end of the workshop in May we aim to have a few clear areas of focus that the LAB wants to explore. We are planning to have a meeting in July, a two-day gathering in Lisbon in September and another meeting towards the end of the year. We are also planning an event in the autumn which will explore for a wider audience communicating the value of the ocean. Looking ahead, by the end of the workshop in May we aim to have a few clear areas of focus that the LAB wants to explore. We are planning to have a meeting in July, a two-day gathering in Lisbon in September and another meeting towards the end of the year. We are also planning an event in the autumn which will explore for a wider audience communicating the value of the ocean.
  
-Immediate opportunities: see [[events and opportunities]] for details+Immediate opportunities: see [[events and opportunities]] for details.
  
-=== Second Marine CoLAB Workshop ===+==== 2nd Marine CoLAB ====
  
 Framing by Maja Kuzmanovic Framing by Maja Kuzmanovic
  
-The second workshop of the Marine CoLAB builds on ideas and suggestions that emerged during the first meeting in January. We’ll begin at the individual scale and ask what personalities, skills and knowledge make up the Marine CoLAB today. Most of the morning is dedicated to a series of parallel sessions, finding out what the participants would like to contribute to a world-changing Marine CoLAB, formulated as quests, challenges or hypotheses. Based on these outcomes, the participants are invited to design a series of experiments to connect the broad theme of 'valuing the oceans' to their work and interests. +The second workshop of the Marine CoLAB builds on ideas and suggestions that emerged during the [[workshop_201501|first meeting]] in January. We’ll begin at the individual scale and ask what personalities, skills and knowledge make up the Marine CoLAB today. Most of the morning is dedicated to a series of parallel sessions, finding out what the participants would like to contribute to a world-changing Marine CoLAB, formulated as quests, challenges or hypotheses. Based on these outcomes, the participants are invited to design a series of experiments to connect the broad theme of 'valuing the oceans' to their work and interests. 
  
 The experiment designs will form the basis of the first concrete Marine CoLAB collaborations. It might seem too soon to be designing an experiment in an afternoon, but the participants will have a chance to refine and develop the ideas after the workshop. Marine CoLAB would like to encourage an iterative approach. So, while the participants may have big ideas, the challenge is to translate this idea into realistic experiments that can be used to test the idea starting from tomorrow. Rather than establishing a monolithic ambitious two year plan, the participants are invited to use heuristics and learn by doing. Over the course of Marine CoLAB, as they get used to working together the plan is to then move on to developing larger and more complex experiments and initiatives.  The experiment designs will form the basis of the first concrete Marine CoLAB collaborations. It might seem too soon to be designing an experiment in an afternoon, but the participants will have a chance to refine and develop the ideas after the workshop. Marine CoLAB would like to encourage an iterative approach. So, while the participants may have big ideas, the challenge is to translate this idea into realistic experiments that can be used to test the idea starting from tomorrow. Rather than establishing a monolithic ambitious two year plan, the participants are invited to use heuristics and learn by doing. Over the course of Marine CoLAB, as they get used to working together the plan is to then move on to developing larger and more complex experiments and initiatives. 
Line 46: Line 45:
          
  
-==== Challenges, quests and hypotheses ====+===== Challenges/hypotheses =====
  
-After a warm-up game of personality poker and designing personal 'shields' with the skills and personality traits that each participant brings to Marine CoLAB, we looked at issues in the participants' current work that could become a part of Marine CoLAB programme. The participants were invited to think about what they would like to contribute to Marine CoLAB and to propose an Open Space session that others could join. The sessions could take different formats (from presentations and discussions to more hands-on approaches). At the end of the session the outcome should be formulated as a challenge, quest or hypothesis. +After a warm-up game of [[http://stephenshapiro.com/personality-poker/|personality poker]] and designing personal 'shields' with the skills and personality traits that each participant brings to Marine CoLAB, we looked at issues in the participants' current work that could become a part of Marine CoLAB programme. The participants were invited to think about what they would like to contribute to Marine CoLAB and to propose an [[http://www.openspaceworld.org/|Open Space]] session that others could join. The sessions could take different formats (from presentations and discussions to more hands-on approaches). At the end of the session the outcome should be formulated as a challenge, quest or hypothesis. 
  
-=== Job Creation vs. Marine Conservation ===+{{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/16635790207/}} 
 + 
 +==== Job Creation vs. Marine Conservation ====
  
 Hosted by Aniol Esteban Hosted by Aniol Esteban
Line 58: Line 59:
 ** Challenge: changing (negative) perception of Marine NGOs and reconciling the business/industry definition of the "healthy marine environment" with the one created within the Marine CoLAB. ** ** Challenge: changing (negative) perception of Marine NGOs and reconciling the business/industry definition of the "healthy marine environment" with the one created within the Marine CoLAB. **
  
-=== Systemic Interventions ===+==== Systemic Interventions ====
  
 Hosted by Giles Bristow Hosted by Giles Bristow
Line 67: Line 68:
  
  
-=== Co-ordinated experiments ===+==== Co-ordinated experiments ====
  
 Hosted by Nicola Frost Hosted by Nicola Frost
Line 75: Line 76:
 ** Challenge: Creating an experiment (a 'petri-dish' for an issue) in multiple institutions adding up to an outcome based whole. ** ** Challenge: Creating an experiment (a 'petri-dish' for an issue) in multiple institutions adding up to an outcome based whole. **
  
-=== Cultural dimension ===+==== Cultural dimension ====
  
 Hosted by Sue Ranger and Amy Prior Hosted by Sue Ranger and Amy Prior
Line 83: Line 84:
 ** Challenge: what happens if we DON’T take account of the benefits we gain from the marine environment? ** ** Challenge: what happens if we DON’T take account of the benefits we gain from the marine environment? **
  
-=== Engaging with rules ===+==== Engaging with rules ====
  
 Hosted by Sandy Luk Hosted by Sandy Luk
  
-Discussion: engaging with the public during legislative processes can be tricky (and in some situations can actually dilute the result). A good example is the EU fisheries policy [c.f.], where specific problems were hung on other issues and regulations, making the discussion more broad and relevant to larger groups of people. The public can be engaged by pointing to absurd rules and their consequences, for example microplastics, or wasteful agriculture. Another approach is to create 'an easy alternative', by for example comparing the ozone layer & climate change (compare the Montreal protocol vs. Kyoto protocol). It can help to find issues where the legal structure is similar, but the outcomes are different. The public can be keen to get involved when they have a true ability to change the rules. The question remains when and how it makes sense to engage the public in changing rules? Where is public engagement critical, and where can it create unwanted effects? Pooling different skills, as well as identifying leverage points and approaches for intervention could help. Similar to looking at systems changes, issues of co-ordination and strategy arise. +Discussion: engaging with the public during legislative processes can be tricky (and in some situations can actually dilute the result). A good example is the EU fisheries policy [c.f.], where specific problems were hung on other issues and regulations, making the discussion more broad and relevant to larger groups of people. The public can be engaged by pointing to absurd rules and their consequences, for example microplastics, or wasteful agriculture. Another approach is to create 'an easy alternative', by for example providing alternatives to CFCs during phase out of ozone depleting gasses. This may not be so easy with regards to climate change (compare the Montreal protocol vs. Kyoto protocol). It can help to find issues where the legal structure is similar, but the outcomes are different. The public can be keen to get involved when they have a true ability to change the rules. The question remains when and how it makes sense to engage the public in changing rules? Where is public engagement critical, and where can it create unwanted effects? Pooling different skills, as well as identifying leverage points and approaches for intervention could help. Similar to looking at systems changes, issues of co-ordination and strategy arise. 
  
 ** Challenge: when is engaging the public the best way to change the rules? How is this done best? ** ** Challenge: when is engaging the public the best way to change the rules? How is this done best? **
        
  
-===== Experiments =====+====== Experiments ======
  
-Using the challenges/hypotheses as a starting point, the participants designed a set of experiments. The constraints are that the experiment should be implemented by July using the current resources of Marine CoLAB. The participants were free to structure their own design sessions as they saw fit. GROWTH cards were offered on the tables as a way to guide the conversations from goal to outcome. +Using the challenges/hypotheses as a starting point, the participants designed a set of experiments. The constraints are that the experiment should be implemented by July 2015 using the current resources of Marine CoLAB. The participants were free to structure their own design sessions as they saw fit. [[http://www.valilalioti.com/tools.html|GROWTH cards]] were offered on the tables as a way to guide the conversations from goal to outcome. 
  
 Details of each experiment can be found on the following pages; Details of each experiment can be found on the following pages;
-  * [[system change experiment]] +  * [[system change experiment|System change]] 
-  * changing perceptions +  * [[perception experiments|Changing perceptions]] 
-    * [[charm offensive experiment]] +    * [[charm offensive experiment|Charm offensive]] 
-    * [[valuing what matters experiment]] +    * [[valuing what matters experiment|Valuing what matters]] 
-    * [[gone fishing (in the Thames) experiment]] +    * [[gone fishing (in the Thames) experiment|Gone fishing (in the Thames)]] 
-  * [[game on experiment]]+  * [[game on experiment|Game on!]]
  
 +===== Notes & annotations=====
  
-==== Notes & annotations==== +{{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/16624594937/}}
- +
-{{>https://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/16624594937/}}+
 [[https://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/16624594937/|full size image]] [[https://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/16624594937/|full size image]]
  
 +More photos: [[https://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/sets/72157650383972831/|Marine CoLab on flickr]]
  
 +---- 
 +some [[:workshop_notes]] 
  • marine_colab/workshop_201503.1426520279.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2015-03-16 15:37
  • by nik