Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- marine_colab:workshop_20150923 [2015-09-25 09:53] – [Notes 2015-09-24] nik
+++ marine_colab:workshop_20150923 [2015-09-25 10:07] – maja
@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 {{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/21666641302/}}\\
-various photographs can be found at https://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/albums/72157650383972831
+Photographs of the Lisbon trip can be found at https://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/albums/72157650383972831
-====Notes 2015-09-23====
+A field trip to Portugal might seem as a luxury, but spending time together as a team in a different context can be essential for bringing the group closer together and advancing the vision and specific projects. Being with each other in formal sessions, on the bus and socialising before and after the sessions allowed the participants to get to know each other in a range of situations and hear about different aspects of their work and life.
-(a proposed agenda)
+The first session in the lighthouse of Nazare introduced the participants to the Portugese marine conservation context, as well as provided time to think about what the participants wanted to achieve as Marine CoLAB in general, as well as specifically discuss what the purpose of the Lab sessions on Thursday would be.
+=== Portugese Context ===
+Catarina Grillo welcomed Marine CoLAB and described the context within which the Gulbenkian Oceans initiative (GOI) operates. She talked about the importance of the blue economy, in a country suffering from the economic crisis and decrease of investment, including connecting to European maritime and fisheries funds. GOI is specifically focusing on the value of marine ecosystem services, and connecting social and natural sciences. They work with a range of organisations, some of whom we had a chance to meet. The Portugese marine NGO sector is very small, primarily project-based with a maximum of 20 people employed, the rest driven by volunteers. While it is wonderful to have many volunteers involved, this creates a challenge of continuity in the mid term, without much institutional memory. The small size of the sector also has its benefits: it can be agile, as everyone knows each other (a good example is [[https://pongpesca.wordpress.com/PONG Pesca]]). The sector began with a need to get a seat on the table on the common fisheries policy. Now there is a bigger group of marine biologists who essentially do everything themselves. In the UK, the sector grew exponentially in the last 10-15 years. The main difference is in the growth of the support services (fundraising, communication…), where marine conservationists had to learn to work with other skillsets to make projects happen. Skills and funding in the Portugese marine NGO sector need to be diversified. Funding should not be driving the direction of the sector, there should be more of a feedback-loop between the funding and delivery, in response to real needs. Participation is another challenge the sector is dealing with. There isn’t much environmental awareness and the extent of participation tends to be limited to signing petitions. Non-participation is a cultural problem linked to Portugese dictatorship, which ended only 40 years ago. An encouraging aspect of Portugal is that the oceans is seen as a cultural value, it is embedded in cultural traditions for centuries. This means that there is a lot of media attention for fisheries and other marine services related issues.
+{{:marine_colab:trip_to_lisbon_context.pdf|Context and Background Information for the Lisbon Marine CoLAB}}
+{{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/21687997441}}\\
+Marine CoLAB reflections after the field trip:
+ * Good to exchange with Portugese NGOs in their 'native environment'.
+ * Disconnect: realisation that even though the Portugese sector is small, it is still quite disconnected. The participants emphasized the value of exchange and connection between the NGOs, between the fishermen and the communities, as well as connecting marine conservation with other sectors. There is a perceived disconnect in values, which is unsustainable in the long run. For example fishermen don’t express the value of the place; they feel threatened by NGOs, which might distort the collected data.
+  * Realisation that a more holistic values based approach might help to bring marine issues closer to people who don’t understand or don’t care.
+  * Challenges in the Portugese and UK sector are similar. Marine CoLAB could offer mentoring to the Portugese sector, in order to encourage leapfrogging.
+==== Lab Session 2015-09-23 ====
+Co-creating the agenda:
 {{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/21672174311/}}\\ (larger image can be found [[http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/21672174311/|here]])
+From the brainstorming about what the participants wanted to achieve in Lisbon, we distilled the following objectives for the Lisbon LAB sessions:
-(an exploration of explanation...)
+. Direction: Clarify the mission and vision of Marine CoLAB
+  * Design a sketch for a mission statement
+. Incubator for (short-term) experiments/initiatives
+  * Create a project pipeline (existing experiments, projects by participants’ organisations relevant to Marine CoLAB
+  * Have a detailed project planning session for the Plastics experiment
+. Melting pot: look at Marine CoLAB as a long term collaboration (platform, network, think tank…)
+  * Discuss the value of Marine CoLAB beyond individual projects (opportunities, governance, networks, capacities, etc.)
+The LAB sessions should include conversations about "the Big Picture" (values, common direction, "glue", gaps, "big ideas" etc.), as well as hone down on practicalities, such as roles and commitments, next steps and how to create time and space for Marine CoLAB for the participants who are already overcommitted…
+Co-creating the mission statement:
 {{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/21672188371/}}\\ (larger image can be found [[http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/21672188371/|here]])
-{{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/21687997441}}\\
+=== Agenda 20150924 ===
+:30 - 10:30 Check-in; reflection on field-trip, agenda design
+:30 - 11:30 Incubator project pipeline (existing and individual projects). Outcome: list of projects, decision: continue, postpone, abandon.
+:30 - 12:45 Plastics experiment: plan, roles and responsibilities, implications for lab. Outcome: Plastics plan
+:45 - 13:30 Lunch
+:30 - 14:10 Movie screening on Community Voices Method (Sue Ranger), discussion
+:10 - 15:00 Melting pot: reflections on the connections between mission and projects; Marine CoLAB MO (non-project specific); Outcome: agreement on refined vision
+:00 - 15:45 Next steps, action points and agenda for November
+:45 - 16:25 Finalising plastics plan (added after lunch)
+:25 - 16:30 Check out, final reflections and thank yous
 ====Notes 2015-09-24====