Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
marine_colab:workshop_20151125 [2015-12-03 11:27] – [Mission / MIX] majamarine_colab:workshop_20151125 [2016-08-10 09:48] (current) nik
Line 1: Line 1:
 ==== Marine CoLABoration Workshop - November 2015 ==== ==== Marine CoLABoration Workshop - November 2015 ====
  
-[[start|Marine CoLAB]] workshop held at the London Zoo+The last [[start|Marine CoLAB]] workshop in 2015, held at the London Zoo on the 25th of November. Louisa Hooper compared it to standing at the seashore at low tide, with rocks and mud emerging from under water, when we can begin to see the peaks, as well as what lies beneath. One of the biggest challenges for this workshop and the year ahead is how to work more effectively with the resources available. The importance of keeping the big picture visible was emphasised, alongside the practicalities of projects, activities and campaigns.  
 + 
 +In the morning the participants focused om **Marine CoLAB as a whole**. Beginning with a reflection on //Marine CoLAB so far//, looking at what has worked and what needs more work. Grounded in this experience they moved into a visioning process lead by Giles to clarify the Marine CoLAB //vision and mission//. At the end of the morning Sue took the group through a beautiful presentation and discussion of a //values based approach//, as a lens that can be used to shape and evaluate projects, experiments and the initiative itself. In the afternoon, the focus shifted to the **Marine CoLAB project incubator**, beginning with a broad //mapping of existing and emerging projects// by participating organisations which could be relevant to Marine CoLAB facilitated by Aniol. Two following sessions discussed the projects that emerged from previous workshops: possible directions for //GameOn// guided by Sandy and a working/planning session for the //Plastic Bottles project// lead by Heather. The day ended with a session about the future of **Marine CoLAB in 2016**.
  
 ==== Participants ===== ==== Participants =====
 +
 Louisa Hooper, Heather Koldewey, Sandy Luk, Nicola Frost, Amy Pryor, Aniol Esteban, Giles Bristow, Sue Ranger, Mirella von Lindenfels, Sarah Ridley. Louisa Hooper, Heather Koldewey, Sandy Luk, Nicola Frost, Amy Pryor, Aniol Esteban, Giles Bristow, Sue Ranger, Mirella von Lindenfels, Sarah Ridley.
  
 Facilitators: Maja Kuzmanovic, Nik Gaffney, Vali Lalioti  Facilitators: Maja Kuzmanovic, Nik Gaffney, Vali Lalioti 
- 
-This is the last workshop of the first year of [[start|Marine CoLAB]]. Louisa Hooper compared it to standing at the seashore at low tide, with rocks and mud emerging under water, so we can begin to see the peaks, as well as what underlies them. One of the biggest challenges for this workshop and the coming year is how to do less with game-changing effectiveness. It is important to look at the big picture as well well as the practicalities of the months and year(s) to come.  
- 
  
 {{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/22702445914/}}\\ {{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/22702445914/}}\\
  
 +====Marine CoLAB so far====
  
-==== Framing ====+The morning began by distilling a few points from previous discussions on the future of Marine CoLAB which can be used as a starting point or a point of discussion about Marine CoLAB in 2016 and beyond. Marine CoLAB participants are keen to seize opportunities, to re-frame challenges and refresh whole systems. They do this by being a part of trusted collaborations and networks. After a year of working together, the facilitators added that the participants are very keen to- and good at designing and working on projects. 
  
- +At the very first workshop the participants designed a range of possible future scenarios for Marine CoLAB and the worlds in which it could exist. The different futures had two things in common: Marine CoLAB would be integrating values and innovation, as well as establishing and strengthening connections (between the ocean and society, between business and governments, bridging the gapes between local and global governance of oceans).
-Maja Kuzmanovic looked back over the notes of the past year and distilled a few points from previous discussions on the future of Marine CoLAB, that can be used as a starting point or a point of discussion, when looking forward to 2016 and beyond. Marine CoLAB participants are keen to seize opportunities to reframe challenges and refresh whole systems. They do this by being a part of trusted collaborations and networks. After a year of working together, the facilitators added that the participants are very keen to and good at designing and working on projects.  +
- +
-At the very first workshop the participants designed a range of possible future scenarios for Marine CoLAB and the worlds in which it would exist. The different futures had two things in common: Marine CoLAB would be integrating values and innovation, as well as establishing and strengthening connections (between the ocean and society, between business and governments, bridging the gapes between local and global governance of oceans). +
  
 Over the course of several workshops, a range of challenges for Marine CoLAB were identified, including systemic change, public engagement, valuing (cultural dimensions) of oceans, perception of marine conservation, transparency of marine industries and plastic pollution of oceans. The facilitators observed an additional challenge: developing a sustainable support network beyond and in-between projects. This is something that began to be addressed in Lisbon and continues in this workshop.  Over the course of several workshops, a range of challenges for Marine CoLAB were identified, including systemic change, public engagement, valuing (cultural dimensions) of oceans, perception of marine conservation, transparency of marine industries and plastic pollution of oceans. The facilitators observed an additional challenge: developing a sustainable support network beyond and in-between projects. This is something that began to be addressed in Lisbon and continues in this workshop. 
  
-Finally, before delving into the futures, mission, values and a range of experiments, projects and activities, it might be helpful to remind ourselves of the CGF’s goal for Marine CoLAB: **To communicate the role of the ocean for human wellbeing** (particularly connecting natural sciences and economy).  +Finally, before delving into the futures, mission, values and a range of experiments, projects and activities, we reminded ourselves of the CGF’s goal for Marine CoLAB: **To communicate the role of the ocean for human wellbeing** (particularly connecting natural sciences and economy). 
- +
-==== Agenda ==== +
- +
-In the morning the participants focused om **Marine CoLAB as a whole**. Beginning with reflecting on //Marine CoLAB so far//: what worked and what needs more work. Grounded in this experience they moved into a visioning process lead by Giles to clarify the overall Marine CoLAB //vision and mission//. At the end of the morning Sue took the group through a beautiful presentation and discussion of the //values based approach//, as a lens that can be used to shape and evaluate projects, experiments and the initiative itself. In the afternoon, the focus was on **Marine CoLAB project incubator**, beginning with a broad //mapping of existing and emerging projects// by participating organisations which could be relevant to Marine CoLAB facilitated by Aniol. Two following sessions discussed the two projects that emerged from previous workshops: possible directions for //GameOn// guided by Sandy and a working/planning session for the //Plastic Bottles project// lead by Heather. The day ended with a session about the future of **Marine CoLAB in 2016**.+
  
 {{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/23305011056}}\\ {{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/23305011056}}\\
- 
- 
-====Marine CoLAB so far==== 
- 
  
 === What worked? === === What worked? ===
  
 == People == == People ==
-  * Supportive and energising group of people; Imaginative, energetic, energising and funny; Respectful; Genuine and committed people; Passionate, focussed and willing to put in time +  * Supportive and energising group of people; Imaginative, energetic, energising and funny; Respectful; Genuine and committed people; Passionate, focused and willing to put in time when required. 
-  * Open - want to be doing this; Openness of everyone in embracing something new - nice people+  * Open - want to be doing this; Openness of everyone in embracing something new
   * Enthusiasm, engagement and energy of members during LAB meetings   * Enthusiasm, engagement and energy of members during LAB meetings
   * Broad range of skills, expertise and organisation; Balance of skills and knowledge   * Broad range of skills, expertise and organisation; Balance of skills and knowledge
Line 49: Line 39:
 == Time & space to explore === == Time & space to explore ===
   * Flexibility, freedom   * Flexibility, freedom
-  * Time spent together without explicit xxx/outcomes+  * Time spent together without explicit agendas/outcomes
   * Thinking about issues from different perspectives   * Thinking about issues from different perspectives
   * Lack of territoriality and competition   * Lack of territoriality and competition
Line 56: Line 46:
   * New dimensions brought in from CGF (e.g. other labs and communities)   * New dimensions brought in from CGF (e.g. other labs and communities)
   * Workshops in stimulating environments - allowing us to think outside our daily / OP’s (?)   * Workshops in stimulating environments - allowing us to think outside our daily / OP’s (?)
- 
  
 == Community building == == Community building ==
Line 73: Line 62:
 == Support == == Support ==
  
-  * CGF: Hands-on engagement, support and guidance of Louisa and CGF, their agility and responsiveness (e.g. supporting conference attendance(?+  * CGF: Hands-on engagement, support and guidance of Louisa and CGF, their agility and responsiveness (e.g. supporting conference attendance, networking
-  * Facilitators: Support facilitation and advance planning; facilitators help to keep on track; Capturing and documenting of what happened+  * Facilitators: Supportfacilitation and advance planning; facilitators help to keep on track; Capturing and documenting of what happened.
   * Connections of the group to 'enablers' (e.g. Oak)   * Connections of the group to 'enablers' (e.g. Oak)
- 
  
 === What needs more work? === === What needs more work? ===
Line 82: Line 70:
 == Time! == == Time! ==
   * Time to deliver our potential of all ideas and projects   * Time to deliver our potential of all ideas and projects
-  * Finding enough time to engage outside of project ideas are not core business+  * Finding enough time to engage outside of project ideas that are not core business
   * More time thinking and developing a framework for evaluation   * More time thinking and developing a framework for evaluation
   * Retain energy over longer term; retain energy once in project delivery mode   * Retain energy over longer term; retain energy once in project delivery mode
-  * Communication between meetings; time to do things and connect between meetings (though it is happening); Embedding CoLAB work between workshops - last minute flurry of preparation for each one. +  * Communication between meetings; time to do things and connect between meetings (though it is happening); Embedding CoLAB work between workshops - often a last minute flurry of preparation for each one. 
   * Information overload - not always possible to digest what is shared   * Information overload - not always possible to digest what is shared
  
Line 195: Line 183:
 There is a need to find a language all Marine CoLAB participants understand, paying attention to jargon. There is a difference between the term "values" and "value", both are part of one whole, but can be understood quite differently. Sue’s presentation focused on values that connect people and places. What is important in a place? Values are developed through experience and interaction, and form the heartfelt connections between the people and a place, adding to human wellbeing. From these connections "cultural ecosystem services" beyond monetary value can be developed. They include a wider context, create whole ecosystems of interconnected disciplines (e.g. conservation, economy, mythology, wellbeing…) and incorporate different ways of talking and telling stories about a place.  They deliver benefits to human wellbeing and are connected to other ecosystem services. There is a need to find a language all Marine CoLAB participants understand, paying attention to jargon. There is a difference between the term "values" and "value", both are part of one whole, but can be understood quite differently. Sue’s presentation focused on values that connect people and places. What is important in a place? Values are developed through experience and interaction, and form the heartfelt connections between the people and a place, adding to human wellbeing. From these connections "cultural ecosystem services" beyond monetary value can be developed. They include a wider context, create whole ecosystems of interconnected disciplines (e.g. conservation, economy, mythology, wellbeing…) and incorporate different ways of talking and telling stories about a place.  They deliver benefits to human wellbeing and are connected to other ecosystem services.
  
-In order to uncover deeper values, we need to start with basic connectedness (of people and places, different disciplines, different people. This can form a glue, a common basis and shared understanding. +In order to uncover deeper values, we need to start with basic connectedness (of people and places, different disciplines...). This can form a glue, a common basis and shared understanding. 
  
   * developing a shared language based around values we can use to communicate within the group   * developing a shared language based around values we can use to communicate within the group
Line 211: Line 199:
 What are the values of Marine CoLAB? Could **shared values** be Marine CoLAB’s focus at all times and across all projects?  Is there a spectrum of existing values that are shared (instrinsic/extrinsic, economic & cultural, individual & collective, etc.)? By working with a range of different values this approach can focus on whichever value catalyses different target groups - starting from their existing values, connecting them to oceans and each other, making the values collective and shared.  What are the values of Marine CoLAB? Could **shared values** be Marine CoLAB’s focus at all times and across all projects?  Is there a spectrum of existing values that are shared (instrinsic/extrinsic, economic & cultural, individual & collective, etc.)? By working with a range of different values this approach can focus on whichever value catalyses different target groups - starting from their existing values, connecting them to oceans and each other, making the values collective and shared. 
  
-How to begin using a values based approach in Marine CoLAB: **learn by doing**:+How to begin using a values based approach in Marine CoLAB: **learn by doing**
 + 
 +==Next steps ==
   * invite speakers   * invite speakers
   * share readings   * share readings
Line 237: Line 227:
   * Sustainable seafood in Portugal, Spain and EU (NEF, MCS & Client Earth - reducing unlawful fishing; scoping, looking at minimal standards for the seafood industry; including different stakeholders (policy, communities, judges), starting from holistic values and working on changing rules and compliance   * Sustainable seafood in Portugal, Spain and EU (NEF, MCS & Client Earth - reducing unlawful fishing; scoping, looking at minimal standards for the seafood industry; including different stakeholders (policy, communities, judges), starting from holistic values and working on changing rules and compliance
   * [[http://www.bluenewdeal.org/|Blue New Deal]], a possible platform to carry MarCoLab stories.   * [[http://www.bluenewdeal.org/|Blue New Deal]], a possible platform to carry MarCoLab stories.
 +  * [[http://www.coastalpartnershipsnetwork.org.uk/|Coastal Partnerships Network]], a possible vehicle for MarCoLab initiative trials, information dissemination and feedback nationally. UK Marine Planning is about to create opportunities for Coastal Partnerships to become individually more robust and realise ambitions for Integrated Coastal Zone Management. There are opportunities for the MarCoLab to play a central role in shaping the future of Coastal Partnerships and management on UK coasts with values at the heart of it.
  
  
 ==Education and communication== ==Education and communication==
-  * Thames river academy (educational projects) across different sectors, including rivers and seas across the curriculum+  * Thames river academy (educational projects) across different sectors, using rivers and seas as the bedrock of the curriculum and active environmental projects as the basis for transferable skills training.
   * Ocean schools: ocean awareness as part of general knowledge, general education   * Ocean schools: ocean awareness as part of general knowledge, general education
   * [[http://www.mcsuk.org/beachwatch/|Beach Watch]]: citizen science and innovation labs   * [[http://www.mcsuk.org/beachwatch/|Beach Watch]]: citizen science and innovation labs
Line 247: Line 238:
  
 ==Capacity building== ==Capacity building==
-  * [[http://www.coastalpartnershipsnetwork.org.uk/|Coastal Partnerships Network]]+  * [[http://www.coastalpartnershipsnetwork.org.uk/|Coastal Partnerships Network]] currently the Network is run voluntarily but there is a push to create consistency across each Coastal Partnership whilst retaining their local focus and delivery. Capacity needs to be built nationally to ensure marine and estuarine health is at the heart of all local development and economic decisions. The ambition is that each Coastal Partnership plays a neutral, honest broker role to ensure all sectors are involved in coastal management.
   * Capacity building at FFI: new educational programmes, scholarships, masters, adult ed., support for organisations   * Capacity building at FFI: new educational programmes, scholarships, masters, adult ed., support for organisations
   * (FFI co-management approach)   * (FFI co-management approach)
Line 302: Line 293:
  
  
-Next steps+==Next steps==
   * more preliminary research to see which option is most promising      * more preliminary research to see which option is most promising   
     * Sandy, Sue & Heather: Potential research questions, masters topics for students of Exeter University: "next week" to draft a few paragraphs re. research scope etc. Envisaged results: a "research think piece"      * Sandy, Sue & Heather: Potential research questions, masters topics for students of Exeter University: "next week" to draft a few paragraphs re. research scope etc. Envisaged results: a "research think piece" 
Line 317: Line 308:
 {{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/22963277999/}}\\ {{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/22963277999/}}\\
  
-  successful funding proposal + 
-    mayoral election in may 2016 +Working session of the now fully funded (CGF & OAK Foundation) Marine CoLAB project: campaign to make London free of Single Use Plastic Bottles. 
-    focus as a marine project rather than just about 'rubbish' + 
-    * "fountains for the future" project link, roll out in summer 2016 +Three topics to touch on: 
-    * closer look at what has failed, expected backlash, sustainability, strategy +  Values 
-    required; project implementation plantimelineexternal deadlineskickoff meeting (before xmas) +  Reality check (commitments, plans) 
-    collaborative structure; + 
-      2 ppl full time - project mgmt at ZSL (via Project Oceans), narrative & communication TEP + 
-      FF interns some staff for research & background, active mapping process +==Values== 
-      governanceoverview committee, advisory group + 
-      * connections with existing NGOs working in 'plastics space' +What will make individuals change behaviour (intrinsic, economic…)? 
-      * Emma Cunningham re. stakeholder interviews, industry, NGOs, etc +  Look at Frameworks research and qualitative research 
-      * how to ensure 'best advice' is maintained, front of house role? +  * How to avoid industry backlash? 
-    * strategy for mayoral candidates +  * How to make it sustainable? 
-    * establish list of allies, existing contacts and relevant conversations, meetings required. +  * Focus as a marine project rather than just about 'rubbish' 
-    * any upcoming 'big things' to connect to (world cup, etc) esp. positioning for London? +  Have to have a closer look at what has failed in other projects to inform strategy 
-    * start compling hideous facts about single use bottles +  how to ensure 'best advice' is maintainedfront of house role? 
-    * potential case studies (selfridges, ZSL, etc) +  * start compling hideous facts about single use bottles 
-    * how do we explicitly test values based research?+  * Design campaign to include values as an essential part of it: continue discussion at the brainstorming meeting in December. 
 +  * How to explicitly test values based research? 
 + 
 + 
 +== Reality Check == 
 + 
 +The funding proposal was successful: now a few urgent things to do: 
 +  * By 11 December 2015All: Re:read the proposal, agree on commitments and/or adapt if needed.  
 +  ASAP: Heather, Steve, Louisa: paperwork 
 + 
 + 
 +Collaborative structure 
 +  Project management at ZSL (via Project Oceans), narrative & communication TEP 
 +  Governance: overview committee, advisory group - needs to be finalised 
 +  * Recruiting: By 16 December: Heather Amy: draft job descriptions for 2 FTEs (and form an interview panel), advertise in December 
 +  * January: interview applicants 
 +  * Compile a project team ASAP 
 +  * Giles/FF: has staff for research & background, active mapping process. Connect FF’s interns to work on researching case studies (Bristol (tap friendly, public fountains…) Selfridges, ZSL, etc), C40, cities as chanpions, COP, tourism, Blue Bell… 
 +  (Longer term): Form advisory group with different stakeholders (Sue has ideas) 
 + 
 +Implementation plan 
 +  * 16 December: Initial startup meeting: Heather, Mirella, Amy, Giles, Louisa 
 +  * 12 January (from 2pm) Full planning meeting with other experts from organisations 
 +  * After January plan at least one meeting per month 
 +  * Short term focus: Mayoral election in May 2016: need strategy for mayoral candidates - Campaigns are written NOW (Louisa has a few people who should be engaged in this):  
 +    * How to get a meetingExploratory conversations to identify what is the opportunity for the candidates. 
 +    * Offer solutions/alternatives: economic benefitscarbon emission reduction, making London less dirty…. 
 +  * Longer term: Systems Mapping exercise and stakeholder conversations (linked to advisory group) 
 +  Identify target groups (from systems mapping) 
 +  * Outsource research: to e.g. frameworks research - additional funding will be available for this research from CGF. Which questions need asking? 
 +   
 +    * Link to related initiatives, e.g. "fountains for the future" project link (roll out in summer 2016), connections with existing NGOs working in 'plastics space'; e.g. Emma Cunningham re. stakeholder interviews, industry, NGOs, etc. Establish list of allies, existing contacts and relevant conversations, meetings required. 
 +  Research any upcoming 'big things' to connect to (world cup, etc) esp. positioning for London? 
 +      
  
 ====Planning 2016==== ====Planning 2016====
  
-  * 10 days of time is covered per organisation +10 days of time per organisation is covered by CGF core funding for Marine CoLAB. How best to structure the time? 
-  * how best to structure the time? + 
-  * smaller, structured meetings around particular topics/projects +==Marine CoLAB as a collaborative network== 
-  * aggregating projects (mapping), specific project (plastics) +  * What does a lab community look like? 
-  * discuss learning which emerges from projects +  * Collaboration as an improvement over competition for limited resources 
-  * what can we teach each other +  * Added value of open thinking space, facilitated structure 
-  * sometime for thinking about wider issues, larger context, incubation of vague ideas. +  * Further work required on values, strategy, project updates, planning, evaluation.
-  * time to proactively communicate, +
-  * better integration of partners into project proposals -> more explicit collaborations +
-  * clarify evidence base for the lab, both process and projects +
-  * collaboration as an improvement over competition for limited resources +
-  * how can new/other partners get involved in the future? +
-  * more focus on strategy, strategy work teamexternal communication+
   * 4~6 days of meetings of entire group   * 4~6 days of meetings of entire group
-  * (cf. global strategy for sharks) +  * some time for thinking about wider issues, larger context, incubation of vague ideas (cf. global strategy for sharks) 
-  * added value of open thinking space, facilitated structure +  * What can we teach each other? Discuss learning which emerges from projects 
-  * further work required on values, strategy, project updates, planning, evaluation. +  * More focus on strategy, strategy work teamexternal communication 
-  * circulate set of objectives, further ideas +  * To do: circulate set of objectives, further ideas towards a governance structure, business and operational models (next workshop early 2016) 
-  * what does a lab community look like? + 
-  * strategy for engagement? +== Marine CoLAB Activities / Projects == 
-  * clear criteria for 'a lab project'?+  * Smaller, structured meetings around particular topics/projects 
 +  * Aggregating projects (from existing/emerging projects mapping), work-streams on specific project (now: Plastics) 
 +  * Clarify criteria for 'a lab project' 
 + 
 +== Communication and stakeholder engagement == 
 +  * Time to proactively communicate! 
 +  * Clarify evidence base for the lab, both process and projects 
 +  * How can new/other partners get involved in the futureStrategy for engagement? 
 +  * Better integration of partners into project proposals -> more explicit collaborations 
 + 
  
 ====Next Steps==== ====Next Steps====
-  * project mapping 
-    * write up value space for each project -> further mapping 
-    * Aniol to compile & reformat existing info by end of the week 
-    * edits, additions and value prompt to be submitted by Dec. 4th 
-  * Game On!  
-    * potential research questions, masters topics.  
-    * Sandy, Sue & Heather draft a few paragraphs re. research scope etc. "next week" 
-  * Plastics  
-    * schedule next meetings, brainstorming, etc 
-    * project implementation plan, timeline, external deadlines. kickoff meeting (before xmas) 
-    * establish list of existing contacts and relevant conversations, meetings required. 
-  * 2016 and further 
-    * write a few paragraphs about how Marine CoLab has changed/improved current work 
-    * circulate set of objectives, further ideas 
-  * each participant to write a one page year in review by xmas -> send to louisa 
  
 +
 +07/12 Fill in the Project Incubator Form.
 +  * The form and questions can be found here: http://lib.fo.am/marine_colab/project_incubator_form
 +  * -> Send to Aniol
 +
 +11/12 Re-read the proposal, agree on commitments.
 +  * -> Send to Heather
 +
 +16/12 Plastics project working meeting (Marine CoLAB only).
 +  * -> Let Heather know if you’re coming.
 +
 +24/12 Write a few paragraphs describing the benefits of Marine CoLAB
 +  * e.g. How did it affect ways of working, key outcomes for you, effects it had on specific projects, long term value etc.
 +  * -> Send to Louisa.
 +
 +Dec. GameOn: Potential research questions and masters topics
 +  * -> Sandy, Heather, Sue
 +  * -> Heather: connect GameOn to 'virtual Chagos' (w/shop in 2016)
 +  * -> Sue: probe contacts (Octonauts) as potential test audience
 +
 +Dec. Plastics:
 +  * Project implementation plan, timeline, external deadlines;
 +  * Establish list of contacts, setup meetings
 +
 +12/01   Plastics: Planning meeting with experts from organisations (2pm)
 +
 +== Before the next workshop ==
 +
 +  * Circulate set of objectives for Marine CoLAB in 2016 and beyond
 +  * Collect ideas towards a governance structure & business models
 +  * Mission: Giles to send the mission statement for review to all
 +  * Values:
 +    * Share reading on this topic online: http://lib.fo.am/marine_colab/recommended_reading
 +    * Invite speakers (e.g. Chris Rose, Frameworks...)
 +
 +== During the next workshop ==
 +
 +Values based approach
 +  * All: present your approach to values connecting humans and oceans
 +  * Values based approach as the hallmark of the Marine CoLAB Strategy
 +  * Values a part of all Marine CoLAB communication
 +  * Rethink projects in terms of value lens
 +
 +Vision, Mission, Strategy for Marine CoLAB network
 +  * Finalise work from previous workshops
 +  * Discuss business, governance and operational models (incl. best practices from CGF)
 +
 +Project Incubator
 +  * Discuss how to inform or engage with existing and new projects
 +  * Further mapping; Contributions from other partners, possibly a time-line and potential interactions between projects (dependencies…)
 +
 +----
 +[[:workshop notes]]
  • marine_colab/workshop_20151125.1449142066.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2015-12-03 11:27
  • by maja