I have been offered this Transiency in June 2012, and wrote down any inspiring topic I may want to address during this period until the actual start of the Transiency, in November 2013.

As I do not have smartphone, I use old style paper notebooks to write down burning questions/comments/ideas, references and field notes. I write down stuff almost everyday, on quite many different topics. Therefore, I decided to ease the browsing process by adding up small tags into brackets to whatever I was writing down. Here are some tag examples:

• [REF] is used for litterary and online references
• [LMK] is used for Landmark Papers
• [PROJ] is used for projects I would like to implement in the future
• [FUT] is used for mid-term to long-term ideas of what I may like to do as a profession in the future.
• [ADR] is mainly used when I travel for addresses I would like to remember, like nice coffee places, or spots to watch beautiful landscapes.
• [GDS] is used to record transient magical moments I would like to remember over the long term.
• [FoAM2013] was used to record any Transiency-related content.

One major phase of the project definition process was therefore to browse the eight notebooks I filled since June 2012 to gather any [FoAM2013]-labeled content.

When doing online search, I directly used the computer to write down inspirationnal material regarding the Transiency. In my “numerical & online notebooks”, I had:

• Web bookmarks into the bookmark management tool Diigo under the label “FoAM2013”
• As I did not use my personal computer at work, I also had to process E-mails with links grouped under the label “FoAM2013”
• A text document called “FoAM 2013” for random non-links stuff like keywords and direct references to activities or Metabolhomics processes
• A folder called “FoAM 2013” filled up with PDFs to read, images, and other stuff.

All this material was classified together with the Paper Notebooks material.

Some of this content was outdated, so I decided to operate a first filtering step at the root level, and gathered onto post-its only the topics which still seemed relevant to address in November 2013. This induced lack of traceability, as I have no direct access to the whole set of topics I would have liked to adress during this Transiency. However, it lightened the amount of material to sort, which was already representing much more than the amount I would be able to work on within a year.

I started by just accumulating post-its in a unordered way during one browsing day. Ordering seems easier when you reached a kind of critical mass.

From this critical mass emerged a first classification in three categories:

1. Practices: a set of activities I want to learn or practice during this year.
2. Metabolhomics: elements regarding the DIY upcycled bio-based self-sufficient habitat I plan to map and prototype this year.
3. Language: a set of keywords describing the approach, methods and activities performed during this Transiency.

More details about the sorting algorithm which helped me sort this into categories are available here.

After more days of notebook content gathering, a bigger amount of post-its allowed to define sub-categories to the first basic classification scheme. Some categories where restructured when balance in the content would change with the growing number of post-its.

Processing language: essential key words and essential anti-key words.