Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- michka:research:microbial_fuel_cells [2014-10-03 12:47] – michka
+++ michka:research:microbial_fuel_cells [2014-10-03 12:50] – michka
@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 I am currently playing with parameters: sample source, design geometry, electrode materials, nature of the proton exchange membrane (PEM), water source... To understand better the drivers of electrical power delivered by these Quick & Dirty MFCs.
-So far, the peak power I measured was 0.5 mW [[michka:research:microbial_fuell_cells:Bruxelles2|during my experiments in Brussels]], which is still not sufficient.
+So far, the peak power I measured was 0.5 mW [[michka:research:microbial_fuel_cells:Bruxelles2|during my experiments in Brussels]], which is still not sufficient.
 (see also [[:fuel_cell]] for futher info...)
-====From Litterature====
+====Inspirations====
+I started this research by looking for existing quick & dirty designs online. I found two main categories of designs
 ===Two containers + Air Pump Design===
-[[http://www.instructables.com/id/DIY-Microbial-Fuel-Cell-easy/|This design]] is made of two containers, bridged together with a salt bridge (rope dipped in saturated salted water, wrapped in insulating tape), one with pond sludge, another with clear water.
+[[http://www.instructables.com/id/DIY-Microbial-Fuel-Cell-easy/|This **two-container + air pump** design]] is made of two containers, bridged together with a salt bridge (rope dipped in saturated salted water, wrapped in insulating tape), one with pond sludge, another with clear water.
 An airpump feeds clean water with oxygen for the reduction reaction: protons coming from sludge by the salt bridge, together with electrons coming from sludge by the wires, recombine with oxygen to make water. The airpump allows high current to be produced.