Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
models_of_social_intelligence [2009-01-19 11:24] – davegriffiths | models_of_social_intelligence [2009-01-19 11:37] – davegriffiths | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
- Social structures and organisation: | - Social structures and organisation: | ||
- | Establishing relationships might be easy - it's quite possible for people to have relationships of a form with inanimate objects, maintaining and developing a relationship is harder. | + | Establishing relationships might be easy - for instance, |
Bickmore & Picard - relationship maintenance strategies, based on human-human relationship maintenance: | Bickmore & Picard - relationship maintenance strategies, based on human-human relationship maintenance: | ||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
* The influence of a social agent on a person | * The influence of a social agent on a person | ||
- | * Social agent = another person, social role, norm or group | + | * Social agent could be another person, |
* Social power can be resisted | * Social power can be resisted | ||
+ | * The amount of influence of a social power can be controlled | ||
=====Social Attraction===== | =====Social Attraction===== | ||
Line 93: | Line 94: | ||
http:// | http:// | ||
- | POX triple | + | The theory states that people tend to avoid unstable cognitive configurations. For instance if agent A knows and likes agent B, and they both are aware of, and have positive feelings towards object C then there is balance, similarly if they both have negative feelings towards object C. If they disagree then there is imbalance, which can be resolved from agent A's perspective by one of three steps: |
- | p = person | + | * Agent A switches to dislike of agent B |
- | o = other person | + | * Agent A decides to change it's mind and agree with agent B about object C |
- | x = object | + | * Agent A attempts to change agent B's mind, in order to make it agree about object |
- | The theory states that people tend to avoid unstable cognitive configurations. | + | The last option takes more work than the other two, and so there is also a concept of cost for maintaining social balance. |
======Examples of Socially Intelligent Agents====== | ======Examples of Socially Intelligent Agents====== | ||
Line 150: | Line 151: | ||
* -> emotion -> autobiographic memory | * -> emotion -> autobiographic memory | ||
- | **PSI** | + | **PSI**: [[http:// |
Needs/ | Needs/ | ||
Line 162: | Line 163: | ||
Needs given weights, Reactive level/ | Needs given weights, Reactive level/ | ||
- | + | More info: [[http:// | |
- | ======Theory of Mind in Social Agents====== | + | |
- | + | ||
- | The ability to infer mental states in others that are not directly observable. | + | |