Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
open_sauces_errata [2010-10-11 15:49] 83.101.5.51open_sauces_errata [2014-07-03 16:04] nik
Line 1: Line 1:
 ==== open sauces tasks/errata/miscellanea==== ==== open sauces tasks/errata/miscellanea====
 +
 +
 +==== errata for first edition ====
 +  * page 89 "15ml tablesppons of ginger" should read [...]
 +
 +
 +
 +==== notes and pre-publication errata ====
  
 items marked as <del>deleted</del> have been done. items marked as <del>deleted</del> have been done.
  
-==== notes ==== 
  
   * hypen/dash guidelines   * hypen/dash guidelines
Line 182: Line 189:
   * check chemical notation   * check chemical notation
     * only one or two of these have ended up in the publication, no? the one i found looked alright.     * only one or two of these have ended up in the publication, no? the one i found looked alright.
-  * check IPA for 'stump' and/or 'stampot'+  * <del>check IPA for 'stump' and/or 'stampot'</del>
   * check capitalisation & italic of 'Miel beton'   * check capitalisation & italic of 'Miel beton'
     * i think i checked this, so it should simply be as indicated in the final plain text versions.  --- //[[alkan.chipperfield@gmail.com|Alkan Chipperfield]] 2010/04/14 02:50//     * i think i checked this, so it should simply be as indicated in the final plain text versions.  --- //[[alkan.chipperfield@gmail.com|Alkan Chipperfield]] 2010/04/14 02:50//
   * <del>map for feral trade coffee -> double gold recipe</del> use for online edition   * <del>map for feral trade coffee -> double gold recipe</del> use for online edition
-  * check chinese in ginger soup recipe+  * <del>check chinese in ginger soup recipe</del>
     * well, as i mentioned by email a while ago, there is nothing in the characters that suggests they //aren't// what they're meant to be   --- //[[alkan.chipperfield@gmail.com|Alkan Chipperfield]] 2010/04/14 02:50//     * well, as i mentioned by email a while ago, there is nothing in the characters that suggests they //aren't// what they're meant to be   --- //[[alkan.chipperfield@gmail.com|Alkan Chipperfield]] 2010/04/14 02:50//
   * <del>check urls for accurcy & consistency</del> see above   * <del>check urls for accurcy & consistency</del> see above
   * check footnote consistency   * check footnote consistency
     * the few footnotes there are now look fine. maybe consider using a numeral in sneha's (even though there's just the one footnote) to keep it consistent with bernard's article.     * the few footnotes there are now look fine. maybe consider using a numeral in sneha's (even though there's just the one footnote) to keep it consistent with bernard's article.
-  * check libarynth and foam -> opensauces.cc urls+  * <del>check libarynth and foam -> opensauces.cc urls</del>
   * <del>quote references. eg. " Herbert Spencer in The Big Fat Duck Cookbook (Bloomsburry, 2008)" or " F. Adria, J. Soler, A. Adria. El Bulli Books 2003. Rte. (El Bulli S.L., 2005)" i prefer the first.</del>   * <del>quote references. eg. " Herbert Spencer in The Big Fat Duck Cookbook (Bloomsburry, 2008)" or " F. Adria, J. Soler, A. Adria. El Bulli Books 2003. Rte. (El Bulli S.L., 2005)" i prefer the first.</del>
  
  
  • open_sauces_errata.txt
  • Last modified: 2014-07-03 16:04
  • by nik
  • Currently locked by: 111.225.149.113