Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
pneumatology [2008-02-17 21:05] – 217.166.72.254 | pneumatology [2008-02-21 11:58] – 62.166.51.71 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ===== P N E U M A T O L O G Y ===== | + | |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | =====P N E U M A T O L O G Y===== | ||
[// | [// | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
Line 7: | Line 10: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
< | < | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
// | // | ||
- | --> guerrilla art-forms -- portable, robust, low-tech, recyclable media, materials and technologies that can adapt to a variety of conditions. How can we make works such as responsive environments more mobile, easy to unpack, even pocket-size (inflate as needed)? how can we make such works | + | --> guerrilla art-forms -- portable, robust, low-tech, recyclable media, materials and technologies that can adapt to a variety of conditions. How can we make works such as responsive environments more mobile, easy to unpack, even pocket-size (inflate as needed)? how can we make such works accessible to people without galleries and black boxes - in the middle of the desert, or a jungle, or in an urban ghetto? is this type of art and tech needed at all? (think of modular tech and architectures, |
- | accessible to people without galleries and black boxes - in the middle of the desert, or a jungle, or in an urban ghetto? is this type of art and tech needed at all? (think of modular tech and architectures, | + | |
\\ | \\ | ||
//Real//: ' | //Real//: ' | ||
- | --> from extreme sports to extreme arts, (sometimes) defying the laws of physics. experiments in wind tunnels and zero-gravity, | + | --> from extreme sports to extreme arts, (sometimes) defying the laws of physics. experiments in wind tunnels and zero-gravity, |
- | interventions, | + | |
\\ | \\ | ||
- | I've tasted 3 design principles of [[gRig]]: | + | while working on this research, |
// | // | ||
// | // | ||
Line 28: | Line 36: | ||
- | ====Lightness as a state of being==== | + | |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Lightness as a state of being ===== | ||
Around our contemporary environmental questions at least one thing became clear to me and that’s that out of fear, or to build on top of our guilt, we can’t create anything. So instead I rather like to slide the heavy burden of my shoulders and choose the quality of lightness. | Around our contemporary environmental questions at least one thing became clear to me and that’s that out of fear, or to build on top of our guilt, we can’t create anything. So instead I rather like to slide the heavy burden of my shoulders and choose the quality of lightness. | ||
[[Italo Calvino]] underlines this quality as one of his ‘Six Memos for the Next Millennium’, | [[Italo Calvino]] underlines this quality as one of his ‘Six Memos for the Next Millennium’, | ||
Imagine a life more light and imagine it to be constructed more mobile, flexible, portable, organic and more related to our natural surroundings and the elements, and that we can create our homes or shelters wherever our heart is with no fixed form or any beginning and end, either spatially or in time. | Imagine a life more light and imagine it to be constructed more mobile, flexible, portable, organic and more related to our natural surroundings and the elements, and that we can create our homes or shelters wherever our heart is with no fixed form or any beginning and end, either spatially or in time. | ||
- | |||
- | And I wonder can we construct our worlds from the lightest quality surrounding us everywhere: –air-. | ||
- | Air's once palpable presence in contemporary architecture has become largely invisible. Our architecture is often asphyxiating its inhabitants, | ||
The Renaissance embodied the idea of air or better ‘pneuma’ [wind, air, breath, spirit and soul] in their art of building. One of the primary goals of renaissance architects was to enhance the powers of pneuma so as to foster the art of well-being, essence, wind and ventilation were core principles of classical buildings. Pneuma was a wonderful link for establishing harmony between the human body, architecture and the cosmos, and that building was envisioned as a mediator between the inhabitant' | The Renaissance embodied the idea of air or better ‘pneuma’ [wind, air, breath, spirit and soul] in their art of building. One of the primary goals of renaissance architects was to enhance the powers of pneuma so as to foster the art of well-being, essence, wind and ventilation were core principles of classical buildings. Pneuma was a wonderful link for establishing harmony between the human body, architecture and the cosmos, and that building was envisioned as a mediator between the inhabitant' | ||
Line 41: | Line 59: | ||
| | ||
- | Inflatable architecture is simply constructed | + | And in wondering if we can construct our worlds |
+ | |||
+ | |||
Line 64: | Line 85: | ||
{{ant_.jpg? | {{ant_.jpg? | ||
- | //We imagine that one has to be an expert to create these objects, with a few marks of the pencil, worked out laboriously at the computer. But to respect the individual who is not an expert precisely for his lack of expertise. | + | //We imagine that one has to be an expert to create these objects, with a few marks of the pencil, worked out laboriously at the computer. But to respect the individual who is not an expert precisely for his lack of expertise. |
- | The danger is that experts can’t do that anymore, because he’s already learned how things ought to be done, unless he gives up his own ideas and opinions. Everything that is inept, wayward, intuitive, instinctive and emotional, and emerges from ourselves- that is the expertise of the non-expert. Only a great army of ‘non’ specialists’ can give us a proper revolution. Once the individual can go his own way, free of rules and regulations, | + | The danger is that experts can’t do that anymore, because he’s already learned how things ought to be done, unless he gives up his own ideas and opinions. Everything that is inept, wayward, intuitive, instinctive and emotional, and emerges from ourselves- that is the expertise of the non-expert. Once the individual can go his own way, free of rules and regulations, |
Line 94: | Line 115: | ||
- | =====Research topics===== | ||
- | ***A Visual Collection of -Alive Inflatables-** | ||
- | In looking for structures for inflatables as a visual survey; I became very tired quickly. | ||
- | Maybe because I came across a lot of dead stuff. So I decided to intuitively look for inflatables I just liked. And then after looking at them I found out what the quality of these inflatables was and that was that they were alive. In such a way that it are inflatable spaces you want to be emerged with, play with, be involved with | ||
- | And some of these inflatables are to simple to be true, but have an amazing opening effect on people. | ||
- | So I look for inflatable architectural structures which are alive in one way or another, where something is happening. | ||
- | the collection of Living Inflatables one can see at: ……. | ||
- | ***A pattern language for -living inflatables** | ||
- | Chistopher Alexander has unraveled in 1977a pattern language to create ' | ||
- | And I have made a specific pattern language for -inflatable architectural structures-, | ||
- | ***Design considerations | + | |
- | After Coming across some problematic patterns in creating inflatables myself, and the inflatable structures of the architects of Airs’s Luminarium and some more colleagues, | + | |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ====Results==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | | ||
+ | |||
+ | | ||
+ | |||
+ | | ||
+ | |||
+ | * design considerations for inflatable structures | ||
+ | |||
+ | * a collection | ||
+ | |||
+ | * an inventory of innovative | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
Line 314: | Line 354: | ||
* People inside became very sleepy after a while; it´s a passive space aswell the ongoing ambient music makes you murf and maybe it was as well the dose or flow of oxygen which slows you down.\\ | * People inside became very sleepy after a while; it´s a passive space aswell the ongoing ambient music makes you murf and maybe it was as well the dose or flow of oxygen which slows you down.\\ | ||
+ | |||
Line 524: | Line 565: | ||
but you can set your goal for 20 years, just define where you wanna go.\\ | but you can set your goal for 20 years, just define where you wanna go.\\ | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Discussion==== | ||
+ | - As I' | ||
+ | |||
+ | * // | ||
+ | |||
+ | * The second design principle playfullness, | ||
+ | |||
+ | * The thirth principle was modularity. One can always ask yourself how does it feel, to have a modular surrounding. Nature is never modular. Nature is full of almost similar units (waves, raindrops, blades of grass-) but though the units of one kind are all alike in their broad structure, no two are ever alike in detail. - the same broad features keep recurring over and over again. - in their detail appearance these broad features are never twice the same. - The quality of places is never twice the same, because it always takes its shape from the particular place in which it occurs. Each part is slightly different, according to its position in the whole. Each branch of a tree has a slightly different shape, according to its position in the tree. Each leaf on the branch is given its detailed form by its position on the branch. So an alternative is to think of differentiating spaces: It is not a process of addition, in which pre-formed parts are combined to create a whole: but a process of unfolding, like the evolution of an embryo, in which the whole precedes in parts, and actually gives birth to them, by splitting (so becoming different in the process of growth or development). Only a process of differentiation, | ||
+ | |||
+ | - Up to now I noticed people (no matter what their background is) react very strongly on the visual collection of the research, and yes it was the part I enjoyed doing the most. | ||
+ | |||
+ | - As a follow up from this research I have like do realize two events where I will develop inflatable spaces solely inflated by wind. | ||
+ | |||
+ | - I l like to continue on three parts of the research; the collections of the visual survey, the collection of inflatable materials for the library and the list of interesting inflatable producers, labs, experts etc. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Line 541: | Line 620: | ||
* Flying Lightness, Adriaan Beukers - Ed van Hinte, 2005, ISBN 90-6450-538-1 | * Flying Lightness, Adriaan Beukers - Ed van Hinte, 2005, ISBN 90-6450-538-1 | ||
* [[The Eyes of the Skin]], Juhani Pallasmaa, 2005, ISBN 0470015780 | * [[The Eyes of the Skin]], Juhani Pallasmaa, 2005, ISBN 0470015780 | ||
- | * Nature Culture Fusion-Louis G. Le Roy, 2002 ISBN 90-5662-278-1. | + | * Nature Culture Fusion-Louis, G. Le Roy, 2002 ISBN 90-5662-278-1. |
* Leven op ’t hof, Gerard smallegange, | * Leven op ’t hof, Gerard smallegange, | ||
+ | |||