Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
pneumatology [2008-02-20 16:37] – 62.166.51.71 | pneumatology [2008-02-20 18:49] – 62.166.51.71 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 562: | Line 562: | ||
- | ==== results | + | |
+ | ==== Discussion==== | ||
As I' | As I' | ||
- | * // | + | * // |
- | The word itself is putting a heavy load on our shoulders, and conventionaly it focusses on what not to do. It can paralyze us, or pushes our guild buttons; we must shrink our presence, our systems, our activities. So it stops our creativity. But we are part of nature to! Something sustains itself, when its made with real care and when its patterns are deeply connected to ones own experiences then we like to look after it. Sustainability also recalls the idea of preserving, but one has to keep in perspective that all stuff is build to die. So maybe what empowers us more is to think in biolife | + | The word itself is putting a heavy load on our shoulders. It can paralyze us, or pushes our guild buttons; we must shrink our presence, our systems, our activities |
+ | another thing I like to mention is that something sustains itself, when its made with real care and when its patterns are deeply connected to our own experiences, | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | * The second design principle // | + | * The second design principle // |
* The thirth principle was // | * The thirth principle was // | ||
- | Always | + | One can always |
- | The character arises of the old buildings | + | Nature is never modular. |
- | | + | |
Nature is full of almost similar units (waves, raindrops, blades of grass-) but though the units of one kind are all alike in their broad structure, no two are ever alike in detail. | Nature is full of almost similar units (waves, raindrops, blades of grass-) but though the units of one kind are all alike in their broad structure, no two are ever alike in detail. | ||
- | 1. the same broad features keep recurring over and over again. | + | |
- | | + | * in their detail appearance these broad features are never twice the same. |
- | for instance: On the one hand all oak trees have the same overall shape, the same thickened twisted trunk, the same crinkled bark, the same shaped leaves, the proportions of limbs to branches of twigs. On the other hand, no two trees are quite the same. The exact combination of height and width and curvature never repeats itself; we cannot even find two leaves which are the same. | + | The quality of places is never twice the same, because it always takes its shape from the particular |
- | modularity is just a concept.\\ | + | So an alternative is to think of differentiating spaces: |
- | + | ||
- | //The quality of places is never twice the same, because it always takes its shape from the particular | + | |
- | + | ||
- | So an alternative is to thibk of differentiating spaces: | + | |
It is not a process of addition, in which pre-formed parts are combined to create a whole: but a process of unfolding, like the evolution of an embryo, in which the whole precedes in parts, and actually gives birth to them, by splitting (so becoming different in the process of growth or development). Only a process of differentiation, | It is not a process of addition, in which pre-formed parts are combined to create a whole: but a process of unfolding, like the evolution of an embryo, in which the whole precedes in parts, and actually gives birth to them, by splitting (so becoming different in the process of growth or development). Only a process of differentiation, | ||