Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
reprap_software [2008-05-17 11:24] nikreprap_software [2008-05-17 11:57] nik
Line 2: Line 2:
 . . .for the [[reprap]] (the older PPC notes can be found in [[debian ppc]] . . .for the [[reprap]] (the older PPC notes can be found in [[debian ppc]]
  
-===== RXTX =====+==== RXTX ====
  
 used the "Mac OSX/Source package" for RXTX version 2.1. there were numerous compile/configure errors involving a non-existent kernel define ''UTS_RELEASE''. as a quick workaround I commented out these sections of code (which were just checking that the running kernel matched the compiled source). used the "Mac OSX/Source package" for RXTX version 2.1. there were numerous compile/configure errors involving a non-existent kernel define ''UTS_RELEASE''. as a quick workaround I commented out these sections of code (which were just checking that the running kernel matched the compiled source).
Line 44: Line 44:
 ==== FIRMWARE ==== ==== FIRMWARE ====
   * using the k8048 PIC programmer   * using the k8048 PIC programmer
-  * installed sdcc & gputils from debian.. (note sure about the advice at http://reprap.org/bin/view/Main/SDCC but both versions in debian were more recent than the linked debs)+  * installed sdcc (2.7.0 #4818) & gputils (0.13.5-2) from debian.. (note sure about the advice at http://reprap.org/bin/view/Main/SDCC but both versions in debian were more recent than the linked debs)
   * built from svn (checkout 2008-05-17) in ~/reprap/trunk/reprap/firmware/PIC   * built from svn (checkout 2008-05-17) in ~/reprap/trunk/reprap/firmware/PIC
 +  * compiled firmware -> flashed PICS -> 'working' reprap
  
  • reprap_software.txt
  • Last modified: 2008-05-17 13:52
  • by nik