Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- research_report_theun_karelse [2008-02-21 20:26] – theunkarelse
+++ research_report_theun_karelse [2008-02-21 20:30] – theunkarelse
@@ Line 194: / Line 194: @@
 I made one case study by following the events around a particularly violent storm on January 18, 2007 in the Netherlands.\\
 [[Storm]]
@@ Line 304: / Line 305: @@
   * Drowning: and other water related risks are very big business for offshore and recreational purposes.
-From my research into survival engineering it became apparent that there are some areas of design that produce particularly attractive objects. Designs that offer protection to the head or part of the face, especially the nose. Things that offer escape from large structures. Off-shore safety devices. Tools for signaling and navigation.
+From my research into survival engineering it became apparent that there are some areas of design that produce particularly attractive objects:
+  * Designs that offer protection to the head or part of the face, especially the nose.
+  * Things that offer escape from large structures.
+  * Off-shore safety devices.
+  * Tools for signaling and navigation.
@@ Line 339: / Line 346: @@
 ==Public response. ==
-The design of Martin with a bad haircut, slightly overweight and big was intended to place him as a very ordinary guy. But some members of the public have commented that they found it difficult to feel sympathy for him. During the process Martin sometimes devolved somewhat into a bum. He sometimes became more of a caricature, this was largely due to the style of drawing that was applied and the scale of working.
+The design of Martin with a bad haircut, slightly overweight and big was intended to place him as a very ordinary guy. But some members of the public have commented that they found it difficult to feel sympathy for him. During the process Martin sometimes devolved somewhat into a bum. He sometimes became more of a caricature, this was largely due to the linear style of drawing that was applied and the scale of working.
-The public responded well to presentations. Finding unlikely combinations, unlikely threats or solutions seemed powerful tools for connecting with people. Also a good description of the invention works. The imagery may work better in full-color.
+The public responded well to presentations. Finding unlikely combinations, unlikely threats or solutions seemed powerful tools for connecting with people. Also a good name for the invention works. The imagery may work better in full-color.