Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
resilients:go_ask_a_mushroom [2013-02-01 17:18] – 46.128.23.163 | resilients:go_ask_a_mushroom [2017-01-19 09:37] – old revision restored (2013/02/17 20:10) 46.161.9.24 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | === Go Ask A Mushroom === | ||
- | |||
- | Musings on Afterculture | ||
- | |||
- | By Natalia Borissova | ||
- | |||
- | ===" | ||
- | |||
- | What possible intelligent natural systems can we look to for inspiration and guidelines in the patterning of our human living environments, | ||
- | |||
- | ===Spawning the resilium=== | ||
- | |||
- | In mycoforestry and mycogardening mycelium links all the elements in the system together. It unlocks nutrient sources stored in plants and other organisms, redistributes those to wherever they are most needed. It converts rocks and organic debris into food for other species, builds the soil and maintains ecosystem diversity. It does cardinal, life-enhancing work on a grassroots and in constant dialogue with its environment. Human intervention is damaging wild nature, artificial fertilizers cause mycelia to retreat and the soil to lose a key part of its vibrancy. But mycelial networks are resilient. They survive catastrophes. They are able to re-grow and survive following damage. They remediate poisoned land, decompose toxic wastes and radioactive pollutants. And if the fungi can thrive even on gifts, my next question would be: can not we engage these intelligent organisms to remediate a society poisoned by relentless abuse of power and mycofiltrate contemporary culture polluted by artificiality, | ||
- | In my opinion, one of the most significant problems with contemporary culture is that it tends to focus on the “objects“ themselves and surface appearance rather than dynamic interconnectedness, | ||
- | |||
- | So, what if we inoculate society with a mycorrhizal resilient fungus to generally enhance the health of our (cultural) environments? | ||
- | |||
- | As the mycelium exhausts the food sources in one area it expands outward in a circular fashion and the fungus cannibalizes the inner mycelium. It extracts whatever nutrients it can get from there and moves them to the outer, growing regions. Whatever cannot be recycled is shut off from the growing region and allowed to decay. May be it's the time for the culture to cannibalize the inner of decaying itself and extract whatever nutrients left to redistribute them according to the true needs? | ||
- | |||
- | By analogy with mycelia a “resilients-organism” (“resilium”) could be compared with a resilient organism which spreads out widely through time and space, popping up in the most unexpected places to spark joyful illuminations. It adsorbs complex reality upside down, digests it externally by relishing enzymes of curiosity, amazement, inventively, | ||
- | |||
- | ===From mono-culture to self-sustaining ecosystem=== | ||
- | |||
- | What layout or design of our environment could be called “nature-logical”? | ||
- | When each individual organism has multiple roles and interconnections within this kind of ecosystem, edges can be optimised and resources reused. Problems, limitations and mistakes can be embraced creatively, and the environment thrives. There is no need to impose connections from the outside, as each of the ecosystem’s parts is self-organising. The design of this interconnected, | ||
- | |||
- | I wish that human domination and the " | ||
- | |||
- | I propose that a mashroom is conscious. | ||
- | I've heard that mushrooms have a very keen sense of humor. | ||
- | Lez see.. | ||
- | |||
- | |||