Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- resilients:go_ask_a_mushroom [2013-01-29 08:10] – created nik
+++ resilients:go_ask_a_mushroom [2020-06-05 19:41] – old revision restored (2013-02-05 13:49) 114.119.160.139
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 === Go Ask A Mushroom ===
-Musings on mycelial collaborations and (perma)culture
+Musings on Afterculture
 By Natalia Borissova
-What possible intelligent natural systems can we look to for guidance and inspiration in the patterning of our human living environments, and for sketching out a kind of positive vision for a resilient post-culture? What features of resilience in nature can we map onto our human cultural systems?
+What possible intelligent natural systems can we look to for inspiration and guidance in the patterning of our human living environments, and for sketching out a kind of positive vision for a coming "afterculture"? How can we innovate more naturally? Assuming that humans are not the only intelligent organisms on this planet, I would try to look into "plant intelligence" in relation to resilient life after culture. Granted, there’s nothing new in assigning to the "mushroom" the role of a multifunctional "world healer," nor in trying to engage this intelligent organism in the remediation of culture, but still -- when talking about collaboration, culture and life, we can’t overlook the lowly mycelium (the vegetative part of a fungus).
-Granted, there’s nothing new in assigning to the “artist” the multifunctional role of a “mushroom,” nor in trying to cultivate culture through a mycophilic lens where everything is supposed to be mushrooms and magic, but still – when talking about collaboration and culture, we can’t overlook the lowly mycelium (vegetal part of a fungus).
-===Spawning the resilium===
+//"We are born from fungi. 600 million years ago we separated from fungi. Fungi are our ancestors."\\
+-- Paul Stamets ([[http://podcasts.personallifemedia.com/podcasts/224-living-green/episodes/2914-paul-stamets-fungal-intelligence-and-the-21st-psychedelic-journey-how-mushrooms-can-help-save-the-world-in-our-11th-hour-edition-|Living Green Interview]])//
-Looking at forestry, farming and permaculture of natural systems, mycelia links all the elements of these environments together, redistributes resources according to need, converts rock into food for other species, increases soil depth and richness (like an ingenious farmer or a mushroom-engineer). Mycelia does cardinal, life-enhancing work on a grassroots, upside-down level (like a good artist). And when the conditions are right, the mycelia’s multifarious fruits rise up overnight, feeding critters, opening minds, bestowing the world with beauty, and seeding other mycelial systems.
+<html><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/8443129343/" title="image-15 by _foam, on Flickr"><img src="https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8357/8443129343_16890f8419_c.jpg" width="800" height="403" alt="image-15"></a></html>
+===Spawning the resilium===
-By analogy with mycelia as the vegetal part of a fungal culture, a “resilients-organism” (“resilium”) could be compared with a mycorrhizal fungus which spreads out widely through time and space, popping up in the most unexpected places to spark joyful illuminations. It adsorbs reality upside down, digests it externally by freely relishing enzymes of knowledge, and makes it available for other organisms to feast on. Efforts of the resilium need to be focused on the cultivation of healthy soil (aka a non-discriminative and co-creative environment), but when conditions are right, fruiting bodies emerge – flotilla feasts, mountain bear missions, remote sensing flight operations, shroomshops, augmented harvests and many other unique happenings. These fruiting materialisations respond to prevailing conditions and circumstances, and can be repeated in various forms as other creatures from all walks of life join in. The vaster the resilium, the more extravagant the fruiting bodies are that arise from the  fertile undergrowth.
+In (myco)forestry and mycogardening, mycelium links all the elements of the system together. It unlocks nutrient sources stored in plants and other organisms, converts rocks and organic debris into food, redistributes nutrients to wherever they are most needed, builds the soil and maintains ecosystem diversity. It does essential life-enhancing work at the grassroots and in constant dialogue with its environment. Human intervention damages wild nature, artificial fertilizers cause mycelia to retreat and the soil to lose its vibrancy. But mycelial networks are resilient, survive catastrophes and are able to re-grow. They remediate poisoned lands, decompose toxic wastes and radioactive pollutants. If fungi can thrive even on toxins, why not to engage them in the remediation of a "toxic" society and the mycofiltration of a contemporary culture -- ones that are often overlapped and poisoned by relentless abuse of power and polluted by commodity fetishism, bureaucracy, competition, formalism, hierarchy and further modern late-capitalistic values. I believe one of the most significant problems with contemporary culture is that it tends to focus on the "objects" themselves -- surface appearances and pragmatic formal constructs -- rather than on relationships between differing objects/areas and how we treat each other. These relationships are what turn a collection of unrelated "matters" into a functioning system, whether it’s a garden, cultural community, or an ecosystem. By cultivating relationship we can save resources, energy, and labour, and work towards creating a holistic society.
-===From self-sustaining ecosystems to growing cultural communities===
+What if we inoculate culture with a mycorrhizal "fungi" to generally enhance its health? And then when the right conditions are created, multifarious fruits can rise up to "poison" the world with beauty and open minds and seed other mycelia that can then propagate through other territories. When the mycelium exhausts the food sources in one area it expands outward in a circular fashion and the fungus cannibalizes the inner mycelium to be able to extract whatever nutrients it can get in there and move them to the outer, growing regions. Whatever cannot be recycled is shut off and allowed to decay. May be it's time to cannibalize the inner core of our decaying culture, extract whatever nutrients remain in there and redistribute them according to true needs?
-What layout or design of our environment-gardens could be “nature-logical”? I suggest that it is one that is “open” and links many possible components and organisms into one heterogeneous kingdom of useful relationships and mutually beneficial connections – among microbes, plants, insects, birds, mammals, and all the other inhabitants of our world, including people.
+By analogy with mycelia a "resilium" could be compared with a resilient organism which spreads out widely through time and space and pops up in the most unexpected places to spark joyful illuminations. It adsorbs complex reality upside down, digests it externally by releasing enzymes of curiosity, amazement, inventively, converts it in non-discriminative knowledge and makes it available for other organisms to feast on. This method of enzyme releasing and providing food for the others is natural way of resilium's feeding. As soon as enough nutrients are collected in its network, fruiting bodies emerge -- flotilla feasts, mountain bear missions, remote sensing flight operations, shroomshops, augmented harvests and many other unique happenings. These materialisations respond to prevailing conditions and circumstances, and can be repeated in various forms as other creatures from all walks of life can join in. The vaster the resilium, the more extravagant the “fruiting bodies” arise from the fertile undergrowth. When they die down, mycelium, the essential part of the organism, is still alive. And it is not a static object. It grows selectively in response to the chemical signals of other members of the ecosystem.
-When each individual organism has multiple roles and interconnections within this kind of ecosystem, edges can be optimised and resources reused. Problems, limitations and mistakes can be embraced creatively, and the environment thrives. There is no need to impose connections from the outside, as each of the ecosystem’s parts is self-organising. The design of this interconnected, self-sustaining ecosystem differs from the conventional, monocultural approach, where the parts are mostly disconnected from each other and serve just one single purpose within the system.
+===From mono to poly===
-If we believe that cultural communities are real and not merely constructs used for formal and pragmatic convenience, and that they can arise partly for the sake of mutual benefit among their members and come to act somewhat like whole organisms, maybe we can apply these kinds of models and principles for growing a resilium network?
+What layout or design of our environment could be called "nature-logical"? I expect that it is "open" and links many possible organisms into one heterogeneous kingdom of useful relationships and mutually beneficial connections -- among microbes, fungi, plants, insects, birds, mammals, and all the other inhabitants of our world, including the human species. Each individual organism has multiple roles and is interconnected within the system; edges are optimised and resources reused. Problems, limitations and mistakes are embraced creatively, and the environment thrives. There is no need to impose connections from the outside. The design of this self-sustaining ecosystem differs from the formal, monocultural approach, where the parts are mostly disconnected from each other, serve just one single purpose, and require a lot of labour and resources to maintain.
+Learning from these models and principles, the human addiction to domination and the "mono" attitude could gradually change in favour of rotations and symbiotic communities -- just as we in fact are "composites and large mosaics of microbes" although the sometimes disconnected part of one natural whole. What will happen to us?