Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
resilients:go_ask_a_mushroom [2013-02-01 17:22] 46.128.23.163resilients:go_ask_a_mushroom [2020-06-05 22:28] (current) – old revision restored (2013-09-12 12:08) nik
Line 1: Line 1:
-=== Go Ask A Mushroom === +==== Go Ask A Mushroom ====
  
 Musings on Afterculture Musings on Afterculture
Line 5: Line 5:
 By Natalia Borissova By Natalia Borissova
  
-==="..We are born from fungi. 600 million years ago.."/Paul Stamets"===+What possible intelligent natural systems can we look to for inspiration and guidance in the patterning of our human living environments, and for sketching out a kind of positive vision for a coming "afterculture"? How can we innovate more naturally? Assuming that humans are not the only artful organisms on this planet, I am interested to look into "other intelligence" in relation to resilient life after cultureGranted, there’s nothing new in assigning to the "mushroomthe role of a multifunctional "world healer," nor in trying to engage this keen organism in the remediation of culture, but still -- when talking about collaboration, art and life, we can’t overlook the lowly mycelium (the vegetative part of a fungus).
  
-What possible intelligent natural systems can we look to for inspiration and guidelines in the patterning of our human living environments, and for sketching out a kind of positive vision for the approaching AftercultureHow can we innovate more naturally? Assuming that humans are not the only intelligent organisms on this planet, further I would try to look into “plant intelligence“ in relation to mycelium and life after cultureGranted, there’s nothing new in assigning to the “mushroom” the role of the "World's healer" and to the “artist” the multifunctional role of a “mushroom”, nor in trying to cultivate “other“ cultures with a help of fungi when everything will turn into mushroom and magic, but still – when talking about life, culture and collaboration, we can’t overlook the lowly mycelium ( the vegetative part of a fungus).+//"We are born from fungi. 600 million years ago we separated from fungiFungi are our ancestors."\\ 
 +-- Paul Stamets ([[http://podcasts.personallifemedia.com/podcasts/224-living-green/episodes/2914-paul-stamets-fungal-intelligence-and-the-21st-psychedelic-journey-how-mushrooms-can-help-save-the-world-in-our-11th-hour-edition-|Living Green Interview]])//
  
-===Spawning the resilium===+<html><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/8449618016/" title="DSC00515edit by _foam, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8515/8449618016_766f3cc612_c.jpg" width="800" height="468" alt="DSC00515edit"></a></html>
  
-In mycoforestry and mycogardening mycelium links all the elements in the system together. It unlocks nutrient sources stored in plants and other organisms, redistributes those to wherever they are most needed. It converts rocks and organic debris into food for other species, builds the soil and maintains ecosystem diversity. It does cardinal, life-enhancing work on a grassroots and in constant dialogue with its environment. Human intervention is damaging wild nature, artificial fertilizers cause mycelia to retreat and the soil to lose a key part of its vibrancy. But mycelial networks are resilient. They survive catastrophes.  They are able to re-grow and survive following damage. They remediate poisoned land, decompose toxic wastes and radioactive pollutants. And if the fungi can thrive even on gifts, my next question would be: can not we engage these intelligent organisms to remediate a society poisoned by relentless abuse of power and mycofiltrate contemporary culture polluted by artificiality, commercialism, bureaucracy, academism, competitions, kitsch, trends, mercantillism, egoism, fetishism, conformism, biological racism etc as well as to control populations of 'dead' objects, fed projects, curators, provocateurs, collectors, directors, managers and cultural animators, hm?  +=== Spawning the resilium ===
-In my opinion, one of the most significant problems with contemporary culture is that it tends to focus on the “objects“ themselves and surface appearance rather than dynamic interconnectedness, system solutions that save resources, energy, lador and what is really important - our relationships and how do we treat each other — that what creates a whole. These relationships are what turn a collection of unrelated “objects“ into a functioning system, whether it’s a community, or a cultural ecosystem. +
  
-Sowhat if we inoculate society with a mycorrhizal resilient fungus to generally enhance the health of our (cultural) environments? That when the conditions are right, a multifarious fruits would rise up overnight'poisoning' the world with beautyopening mindsseeding other mycelia, and growing into fresh territories?+In naturemycelium links all the elements of the ecosystem together simply by carrying on its usual life cycle. It unlocks nutrient sources stored in plant's cells and other organismsthrough decay and converts the organic matter into more usable formredistributes nutrients to wherever they are most needed, fertilises the soil and maintains its diversity. It does essential life-enhancing work at the grassroots in constant dialogue with the environment. Human intervention damages wild natureartificial fertilizers cause mycelia to retreat and the soil to lose its vibrancy. But mycelial networks are resilient and are able to survive catastrophesre-grow, convert inorganic matter into organic usable form for themselves and for other organisms. They can remediate poisoned landsdecompose toxic wastes and radioactive pollutants. So, if fungi can thrive even on toxins, why not look to them in the remediation of societies and the mycofiltration of contemporary cultures that are often poisoned by relentless abuse of power and polluted by late capitalist values.
  
-As the mycelium exhausts the food sources in one area it expands outward in a circular fashion and the fungus cannibalizes the inner myceliumIt extracts whatever nutrients it can get from there and moves them to the outergrowing regions. Whatever cannot be recycled is shut off from the growing region and allowed to decayMay be it's the time for the culture to cannibalize the inner of decaying itself and extract whatever nutrients left to redistribute them according to the true needs?+I believe one of the most significant problems with contemporary culture is that it over com.modified -- tends to focus on the "objects" themselves -- surface appearances and formal pragmatic constructs -- rather than on relationships between the varying parts and how they treat each otherThese relationships are what turn a collection of unrelated "matter" into a self functioning whole. By cultivating relationship we can save resources, energy, labour, not to mention ourselves, and work towards creating a holistic society.
  
-By analogy with mycelia “resilients-organism” (“resilium”) could be compared with a resilient organism which spreads out widely through time and spacepopping up in the most unexpected places to spark joyful illuminations. It adsorbs complex reality upside down, digests it externally by relishing enzymes of curiosity, amazement, inventively, and non-discriminative knowledge and makes it available for other organisms to feast on. Btw, this method - 'enzyme' release into the surroundings, absorption of the results and providing food for the others should be a natural way of resilium's feeding. When enough nutrients is collected by it's network fruiting bodies emerge – flotilla feastsmountain bear missionsremote sensing flight operations, shroomshops, augmented harvests and many other unique happeningsThese materialisations respond to prevailing conditions and circumstances, and can be repeated in various forms as other creatures from all walks of life can join in. The vaster the resilium, the more extravagant the “fruiting bodies” arise from the fertile undergrowth. When they die down, myceliumthe essential part of the organism, is still aliveAnd it is not a static object. It growths random in response to chemical signals of other members of the ecosystem.  +What if we inoculate culture with a mycorrhizalmedicinalgourmet and magic mushroom cultures to generally enhance its health and imagination? And then when the right conditions emerge, multifarious fruits will rise up to "poison" the world with beauty, and seed other mycelia that further propagate through "fresh" territories 
 +When the mycelium exhausts its food sources in one area it expands outward in a circular fashion and cannibalizes the mycelium within to extract whatever nutrients it can find there to move them to the outergrowing regions. Whatever cannot be recycled is closed off and allowed to decayMay be it's time to ingest the inner core of our decaying culture, extract whatever nutrients remain, and redistribute them according to the true needs?
  
-===From mono-culture to self-sustaining ecosystem===+By analogy with mycelium, a "resilium" could be compared with a resilient tissue which randomly spreads out widely through time-space, pops up in the most unexpected places and sparks joyful illumination. It adsorbs complex reality upside down, digests it externally by releasing enzymes of curiosity, amazement, and other magical compounds. It inventively converts it into non-discriminative knowledge and makes all this available for other organisms to feast on. This method of releasing enzymes and providing food for for yourself and others is the natural way the resilium exists. When enough nutrients are collected in its network, fruiting bodies emerge -- mountain bear missions, remote sensing flight operations, augmented and non-green harvests, flotilla feasts, and many other unique happenings happen. These materialisations respond to prevailing conditions and circumstances, and can be repeated in various forms as creatures from all walks of life join in. The vaster the resilium, the more extravagant the "fruiting bodies" emerge. When the "fruits of resilium" die down, the essential part of the organism is still alive. And it is not a static object, it grows selectively in response to all chemical signals of human and nonhuman entities around it. 
  
-What layout or design of our environment could be called “nature-logical”? I assume that it is one that is “open” and links many possible components and organisms into one heterogeneous kingdom of useful relationships and mutually beneficial connections – among microbes, fungi, plants, insects, birds, mammals, and all the other inhabitants of our world, including human species.  +=== From mono to poly ===
-When each individual organism has multiple roles and interconnections within this kind of ecosystem, edges can be optimised and resources reused. Problems, limitations and mistakes can be embraced creatively, and the environment thrives. There is no need to impose connections from the outside, as each of the ecosystem’s parts is self-organising. The design of this interconnected, self-sustaining ecosystem differs from the conventional, monocultural approach, where the parts are mostly disconnected from each other and serve just one single purpose within the system.  +
- +
-I wish that human domination and the "mono" attitude gives up in favor of rotations and symbiotic communities in favor of constructs used for pragmatic convenience.  +
- +
-I propose that a mashroom is conscious.  +
-I've heard that mushrooms have a very keen sense of humor. +
-Lez see.. +
- +
  
 +What kind of environmental layout or design could be called "nature-logical"? I would say that it is an "open" one that links many possible organisms into one heterogeneous kingdom of useful relationships and mutually beneficial connections among microbes, fungi, plants, insects, birds, mammals, and all the other inhabitants of our world, including the human species; each individual organism has multiple roles and is interconnected within the system; edges are optimised and all resources are reused; problems, limitations and mistakes are embraced creatively, and the environment thrives; there is no need to impose artificial connections from the outside. This self-sustaining approach differs from the formal and monocultural one, where the parts are mostly disconnected from each other, serve a single purpose, require a lot of labour and resources to maintain. We are in fact the sometimes disconnected parts of one natural whole.
  
 +Let's hallucinate that by elaborating these models and principles, the human addiction to domination and the "mono" attitude can gradually change in favour of dynamic rotations, symbiotic communities, and altered senses of reality…
  • resilients/go_ask_a_mushroom.1359739333.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2013-02-01 17:22
  • by 46.128.23.163