Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
style_guidelines [2008-09-08 02:28] – alkan | style_guidelines [2011-07-22 01:27] (current) – alkan | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Style Guidelines ====== | ====== Style Guidelines ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Concerning the indiscriminate use of the ampersand ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The ampersand should be avoided in body copy. It disrupts the flow of the text and produces an unsightly type colour. Its use in this manner is pleasantly absent in any professionally written and designed publication or correspondence. Needless to say, indiscriminately //mixing// "&" | ||
+ | |||
+ | In fact, in most prose, the ampersand is best avoided except in certain standard cases, such as in company names (e.g. H&FJ, Secker & Warburg, Walrus & Barnacles). | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Due to the wonders of modern computing technology, the removal of offending ampersands in any particular document is now a trivial matter. However, this can in no sense be viewed as license to cultivate poor habits in the first place. Every find and replace takes time and involves risk. Even the loss of a few seconds might become critical in a tightly-managed workflow, and the accidental // | ||
+ | |||
+ | Further arguments against the indiscriminate use of the ampersand: | ||
+ | |||
+ | You may have convinced yourself that, since the ampersand consists of just one character, and " | ||
===== Punctuation ===== | ===== Punctuation ===== | ||
Line 68: | Line 81: | ||
[Gowers, //The Complete Plain Words,// 244-46] | [Gowers, //The Complete Plain Words,// 244-46] | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | --- // |