Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
towards_a_third_human-plant_movement [2012-03-30 15:30] – lbilliet | towards_a_third_human-plant_movement [2012-03-30 15:31] – lbilliet | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
// | // | ||
Many of the facts and references mentioned in this essay appear to be inexact or fake. Furthermore, | Many of the facts and references mentioned in this essay appear to be inexact or fake. Furthermore, | ||
+ | \\ | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
In this short critical essay, Rosalind Perrez offers an analysis of the sociological and scientific facts that shaped the evolution of the human-plant (H-P) relationship over the last five decades. Proceeding from the intellectual heritage of Denis Koblak and other theoreticians of the second H-P movement, Perrez discusses the succession of paradigms that held sway over this topic since the birth of political ecology in the 1970s up to the recent events of Curitiba in 2023.\\ | In this short critical essay, Rosalind Perrez offers an analysis of the sociological and scientific facts that shaped the evolution of the human-plant (H-P) relationship over the last five decades. Proceeding from the intellectual heritage of Denis Koblak and other theoreticians of the second H-P movement, Perrez discusses the succession of paradigms that held sway over this topic since the birth of political ecology in the 1970s up to the recent events of Curitiba in 2023.\\ | ||
Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
But the story does not end there. Beyond an accurate analysis of the second H-P movement, Rosalind Perrez wants to convince us that the case of the ' | But the story does not end there. Beyond an accurate analysis of the second H-P movement, Rosalind Perrez wants to convince us that the case of the ' | ||
+ | \\ | ||
---- | ---- | ||
related topics: [[parn]] | related topics: [[parn]] |