Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
towards_a_third_human-plant_movement [2012-03-30 15:31] – lbilliet | towards_a_third_human-plant_movement [2013-02-05 00:26] (current) – nik | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
===Towards a third human-plant movement? | ===Towards a third human-plant movement? | ||
Rolsalind Perrez, April 2028, L.P. Billiet (Ed.), New Göteborg Press, 10 p. | Rolsalind Perrez, April 2028, L.P. Billiet (Ed.), New Göteborg Press, 10 p. | ||
- | \\ | ||
- | \\ | ||
- | // | ||
- | Many of the facts and references mentioned in this essay appear to be inexact or fake. Furthermore, | ||
- | \\ | ||
- | \\ | ||
- | In this short critical essay, Rosalind Perrez offers an analysis of the sociological and scientific facts that shaped the evolution of the human-plant (H-P) relationship over the last five decades. Proceeding from the intellectual heritage of Denis Koblak and other theoreticians of the second H-P movement, Perrez discusses the succession of paradigms that held sway over this topic since the birth of political ecology in the 1970s up to the recent events of Curitiba in 2023.\\ | ||
- | During the last decades | + | // |
- | A new turn emerged in 2017, when progress in genomics revealed the plant origin of a large portion of the non-coding human genome, giving rise to the second H-P movement. But the metaphysical revolution predicted by authors like Jin-Ti Karlova never really happened, mainly because – according to Perrez – the debate has been monopolized by an academic elite, confusing the ' | + | In this short critical essay, Rosalind Perrez offers an analysis of the sociological and scientific facts that shaped the evolution of the human-plant (H-P) relationship over the last five decades. Proceeding from the intellectual heritage of Denis Koblak and other theoreticians of the second H-P movement, Perrez discusses the succession of paradigms that held sway over this topic since the birth of political ecology in the 1970s up to the recent events of Curitiba in 2023. |
+ | |||
+ | During the last decades of the 20th century, plants were the object of numerous analogies and metaphors, most of them coinciding with a personified vision of nature – a mysterious ' | ||
+ | |||
+ | A new turn emerged in 2017, when progress in genomics revealed the plant origin of a large portion of the non-coding human genome, giving rise to the second H-P movement. But the metaphysical revolution predicted by authors like Jin-Ti Karlova never really happened, mainly because – according to Perrez – the debate has been monopolized by an academic elite, confusing the ' | ||
+ | |||
+ | But the story does not end there. Beyond an accurate analysis of the second H-P movement, Rosalind Perrez wants to convince us that the case of the ' | ||
- | But the story does not end there. Beyond an accurate analysis of the second H-P movement, Rosalind Perrez wants to convince us that the case of the ' | ||
- | \\ | ||
---- | ---- | ||
- | related topics: [[parn]] | + | related topics: [[parn]] & [[hpi]] |