Notes from a session held at the Luminous Green Retreat, 29th of April 2007
Dougie Brew
“Designed for looks not practicality or environmental efficiency”
Why? Can it it be done? Would it cost too much? How much was driven by local architecture and tradition?
The question is do design and efficiecny clash, why does green need hessian sack underpants? Is it taste, education or necessity? “The structure”
Rainwater capture, grey water, solar pump on well
Materials floors and paints
Air flow, temperature, blinds and temperature
Trees and garden , shading and use
Lighting wiring switching
heating and cooling “The operation”
The environment is hidden away - old paradigm of hide the waste
recycling hidden?
no energy monitoring
no signs policy or education
food composting and waste?
water - is it monitored? thats the driver of efficiency
Does labelling and information clash with the design ethic?
“Transport”
Is defined by location so this is the decision
did local emissions count, offsetting them and do FoAM know the offset “costs”
“Involvement”
Does involvement of the group in the environmental impact divert from time on the subject - not if done well, they are complimentary
Would this involvement or labelling / attention put off “business” - not really their decision is driven by other factors but approach needs to be timed and managed to that the management of the event does not override the content and purpose.
“How far away are we from our normal world?”
Physically, no one left their professional worlds - what about “FoAM unplugged” the real world distance was accompanied by a virtual space that did not move
do a gadget count and energy balance
try a gadget downtime
link use to unput to raise awareness, make manual generators that force collaboration (you pedal I powerpoint) human-power point.
ENDS (for now)