Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
open_sauces_errata [2010-04-26 23:29] – 203.26.122.12 | open_sauces_errata [2010-09-07 18:35] – nik | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
=== draft #18 (aka open_sauces.draft.20100413.pdf) === | === draft #18 (aka open_sauces.draft.20100413.pdf) === | ||
- | * <del>pp 61. Remove subhead ' | + | * <del>p 61. Remove subhead ' |
- | * <del>pp 55. include author name beneath title.</ | + | * <del>p 55. include author name beneath title.</ |
- | + | ||
- | === still waiting... === | + | |
- | * check all logos | + | |
- | * check E numbers | + | |
- | * check chemical notation | + | |
- | * check footnotes | + | |
- | * check IPA for ' | + | |
- | * check capitalisation & italic of 'Miel beton' | + | |
- | * i think i checked this, so it should simply be as indicated in the final plain text versions. | + | |
- | * map for feral trade coffee -> double gold recipe | + | |
- | * check chinese in ginger soup recipe | + | |
- | * well, as i mentioned by email a while ago, there is nothing in the characters that suggests they // | + | |
- | * check urls for accurcy & consistency | + | |
- | * check footnote consistency | + | |
=== draft #25 (aka open_sauces.draft.20100422.pdf) === | === draft #25 (aka open_sauces.draft.20100422.pdf) === | ||
* changes to ingredients layout. check that amounts and names are consistent with earlier versions | * changes to ingredients layout. check that amounts and names are consistent with earlier versions | ||
- | * pp76. recipe layout/ | + | * p 76. recipe layout/ |
Line 34: | Line 20: | ||
* pp 12-13. taste of brussels. if possible this page should look a bit archaic, with images from old herbaria and/or beer ads (see email for examples) | * pp 12-13. taste of brussels. if possible this page should look a bit archaic, with images from old herbaria and/or beer ads (see email for examples) | ||
* pp 18-19. frills on parentheses very good on this page. background on this page could be a bit dusty (dukkah dust) | * pp 18-19. frills on parentheses very good on this page. background on this page could be a bit dusty (dukkah dust) | ||
- | * pp 49. change amounts in recipe to relative amounts in Stuffed Gol Gappa Balls (see email) | + | * <del>pp 49. change amounts in recipe to relative amounts in Stuffed Gol Gappa Balls (see email)</ |
* < | * < | ||
* < | * < | ||
* pp 92-93. little fires: beautiful, but is it still readable? -- still "needs work" | * pp 92-93. little fires: beautiful, but is it still readable? -- still "needs work" | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * i like the idea of the formatting of the ingredients sections, but somehow the combination of ingredients with and without preceding quantities looks confusing to me… especially where one ingredient listing spills over into multiple lines. -- please add details/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | === draft #31 === | ||
+ | * document-wide. < | ||
+ | * pp 4-7 < | ||
+ | * p 7. < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * heading "Note to the readers on how to get involved" | ||
+ | * p 18. < | ||
+ | * p 25. consider reflowing to avoid the two-line widow in paragraph 3? | ||
+ | * p 28. < | ||
+ | * p 41. < | ||
+ | * pp 42-43. spacing here still seems off to me | ||
+ | * p 47. < | ||
+ | * p 49. < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * p 56. < | ||
+ | * p 61. < | ||
+ | * p 74. < | ||
+ | |||
+ | * i just noticed… the coloured tabs at page corners have no bleed. i don't know if this is intentional or not, but nor do i know why you // | ||
+ | |||
+ | * also don't forget to make the text more legible in the " | ||
+ | |||
+ | === draft #37 (aka the big final reference shindig) === | ||
+ | some quotes still don't have full reference data attached, but in these few cases i think we can get away with it (and in any case no data was supplied by the authors). | ||
+ | |||
+ | the references not corrected below can be left as they are. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * p 18. < | ||
+ | * p 23. < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * p 42. < | ||
+ | * p 56. [can maja supply the citation data] i've used: F. Adria, J. Soler, A. Adria, _El Bulli 2003-2004_ (Ecco, 2006) | ||
+ | * p 61. < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | |||
+ | === draft #41 === | ||
+ | * p 10. **Q.** is it ok for an ellipsis (for quotation elision) to follow a fullstop? i.e. "human sex hormones. … From the Middle Ages" | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Author' | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * p 68. | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **Q:** are you going to keep the blue highlighting for the urls? it looks kind of full-on to me. also, urls listed as references/ | ||
+ | * by the way, why don't you bite the bullet and just give the sourcing sections ragged margins??? just look at the paragraphs on p. 11 (also 37, etc.) :-/ ok.ok.ok. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === still waiting... === | ||
+ | * check all logos | ||
+ | * check E numbers (either wikipedia or 'de essenties' | ||
+ | * check chemical notation | ||
+ | * only one or two of these have ended up in the publication, | ||
+ | * check footnotes | ||
+ | * check IPA for ' | ||
+ | * check capitalisation & italic of 'Miel beton' | ||
+ | * i think i checked this, so it should simply be as indicated in the final plain text versions. | ||
+ | * map for feral trade coffee -> double gold recipe | ||
+ | * check chinese in ginger soup recipe | ||
+ | * well, as i mentioned by email a while ago, there is nothing in the characters that suggests they // | ||
+ | * check urls for accurcy & consistency | ||
+ | * check footnote consistency | ||
+ | * the few footnotes there are now look fine. maybe consider using a numeral in sneha' | ||
+ | * check libarynth and foam -> opensauces.cc urls | ||
+ | * quote references. eg. " | ||