Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
open_sauces_errata [2010-09-08 10:53] – nik | open_sauces_errata [2010-09-08 17:05] – 83.101.5.51 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
=== draft #25 (aka open_sauces.draft.20100422.pdf) === | === draft #25 (aka open_sauces.draft.20100422.pdf) === | ||
* changes to ingredients layout. check that amounts and names are consistent with earlier versions | * changes to ingredients layout. check that amounts and names are consistent with earlier versions | ||
- | * p 76. recipe layout/ | + | * <del>p 76. recipe layout/ |
=== draft #26 (aka open_sauces_draft.20100425.pdf) === | === draft #26 (aka open_sauces_draft.20100425.pdf) === | ||
- | * pp 12-13. taste of brussels. if possible this page should look a bit archaic, with images from old herbaria and/or beer ads (see email for examples) | + | * <del>pp 12-13. taste of brussels. if possible this page should look a bit archaic, with images from old herbaria and/or beer ads (see email for examples)</ |
- | * pp 18-19. frills on parentheses very good on this page. background on this page could be a bit dusty (dukkah dust) | + | * <del>pp 18-19. frills on parentheses very good on this page.</ |
* < | * < | ||
* < | * < | ||
* < | * < | ||
- | * pp 92-93. little fires: beautiful, but is it still readable? -- still "needs work" | + | * <del>pp 92-93. little fires: beautiful, but is it still readable? -- still "needs work"</ |
* < | * < | ||
* < | * < | ||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
* heading "Note to the readers on how to get involved" | * heading "Note to the readers on how to get involved" | ||
* p 18. < | * p 18. < | ||
- | * p 25. consider reflowing to avoid the two-line widow in paragraph 3? | + | * p 25. <del>consider reflowing to avoid the two-line widow in paragraph 3?</ |
* p 28. < | * p 28. < | ||
* p 41. < | * p 41. < | ||
- | * pp 42-43. spacing here still seems off to me | + | * pp 42-43. |
* p 47. < | * p 47. < | ||
* p 49. < | * p 49. < | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
* p 74. < | * p 74. < | ||
- | * i just noticed… the coloured tabs at page corners have no bleed. i don't know if this is intentional or not, but nor do i know why you // | + | * <del>i just noticed… the coloured tabs at page corners have no bleed. i don't know if this is intentional or not, but nor do i know why you // |
- | + | * <del>also don't forget to make the text more legible in the " | |
- | * also don't forget to make the text more legible in the " | + | |
=== draft #37 (aka the big final reference shindig) === | === draft #37 (aka the big final reference shindig) === | ||
Line 67: | Line 66: | ||
* < | * < | ||
* p 42. < | * p 42. < | ||
- | * p 56. [can maja supply the citation data] i've used: F. Adria, | + | * p 56. <del>[can maja supply the citation data] i've used: Ferran |
* p 61. < | * p 61. < | ||
* < | * < | ||
Line 99: | Line 98: | ||
=== still waiting... === | === still waiting... === | ||
* check all logos | * check all logos | ||
- | * check E numbers (either wikipedia or 'de essenties' | + | * <del>check E numbers (either wikipedia or 'de essenties' |
* check chemical notation | * check chemical notation | ||
* only one or two of these have ended up in the publication, | * only one or two of these have ended up in the publication, | ||
Line 113: | Line 112: | ||
* the few footnotes there are now look fine. maybe consider using a numeral in sneha' | * the few footnotes there are now look fine. maybe consider using a numeral in sneha' | ||
* check libarynth and foam -> opensauces.cc urls | * check libarynth and foam -> opensauces.cc urls | ||
- | * quote references. eg. " | + | * <del>quote references. eg. " |